Language

More Fun and Games with Project Censored

Peter Phillips of Project Censored responds to my comment, above:

Dear Al,

Project Censored give briefs on what we call "real news" stories and publishes these links to numerous websites every month.   What you originally said was that you didn't want us to list you work at all.

If you don't want to be in our book, OK that is fine.

But your name calling and slandering of Dan Simon is not OK.

Regretfully,

Peter Phillips

Dear Peter,

You traffic in "judging" journalism, yet you don't seem to know the definition of "slander" (defamatory speech - which is to say untrue - that is spoken orally) as opposed to "libel" (defamatory speech that is written). Since everything I have had to say has been written it can't possibly be "slander." Don't you know the difference? And because it is my honest and true opinion, it is not "libel" (the proper word for written defamation) either.

If Mr. Simon feels he has been libeled, he has the resources (in part thanks to you) to take legal action. But his lawyers will tell him that truth is an ironclad defense. The truth is a bitch, eh?

(And you ought to know: falsely accusing someone of a crime in writing - in this case, "slander" - is itself a form of libel: but not to worry, I have bigger fish to fry.)

On the other hand, I have perhaps opened myself to a lawsuit from the douche bag manufacturers of America, by comparing their product to that social parasite, Mr. Simon.

What puzzles me most is your claim that: "What you originally said was that you didn't want us to list you work at all." That's funny! And demonstrably false. There is a complete written archive of everything that I have written on the matter, both on Narco News and in your email box.

I'll tell you what! I'll give you $100 (from my pocket, that's, like, $1,000 from yours, or more, as a percentage of wealth and income) if you can show me anything I've written that requests anything about not wanting you to "list" my work at all. (I've not asked you not to list it, nor have I asked you to list it; I simply said that I object to my work being published in a book by the commercial publisher Seven Stories and have rejected the "award" that seeks to impose that association upon me.)

In that, you've gone way outside of the available facts and invented a fish story out of whole cloth. And it's evident to all that read this exchange.

But if you really want to fight, keep falsely accusing me of a crime. And to think: how fast you slide from declaring my work exemplary and "award" winning to declaring it "slander." That might also tend to make people wonder about what the deal is with your project.

Honestly,

Al Giordano

Reply

Our Policy on Comment Submissions: Co-publishers of Narco News (which includes The Narcosphere and The Field) may post comments without moderation. All co-publishers comment under their real name, have contributed resources or volunteer labor to this project, have filled out this application and agreed to some simple guidelines about commenting.

Narco News has recently opened its comments section for submissions to moderated comments (that’s this box, here) by everybody else. More than 95 percent of all submitted comments are typically approved, because they are on-topic, coherent, don’t spread false claims or rumors, don’t gratuitously insult other commenters, and don’t engage in commerce, spam or otherwise hijack the thread. Narco News reserves the right to reject any comment for any reason, so, especially if you choose to comment anonymously, the burden is on you to make your comment interesting and relevant. That said, as you can see, hundreds of comments are approved each week here. Good luck in your comment submission!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

User login