Language

thanks, Al!

in this case, it was not so much a "dislike" of the author, as a desire to "quid pro quo his ass" with the same kind of (pointless) financial "punishment" he laid on Obama. (well, pointless to Markos; less pointless to Obama fundraising numbers.)

nevertheless, i see and accept your point.  one way for me to look at it is, if i want to be the most effective solider for Obama both now and after the election, then not reading this book out of 'revenge' is sort of cutting off my nose to spite my face.

thanks for the clarity, as always.

Reply

Our Policy on Comment Submissions: Co-publishers of Narco News (which includes The Narcosphere and The Field) may post comments without moderation. All co-publishers comment under their real name, have contributed resources or volunteer labor to this project, have filled out this application and agreed to some simple guidelines about commenting.

Narco News has recently opened its comments section for submissions to moderated comments (that’s this box, here) by everybody else. More than 95 percent of all submitted comments are typically approved, because they are on-topic, coherent, don’t spread false claims or rumors, don’t gratuitously insult other commenters, and don’t engage in commerce, spam or otherwise hijack the thread. Narco News reserves the right to reject any comment for any reason, so, especially if you choose to comment anonymously, the burden is on you to make your comment interesting and relevant. That said, as you can see, hundreds of comments are approved each week here. Good luck in your comment submission!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

User login