Language

Indeed, I am not

Indeed, I am not particularly worried--and I take the electoral map senerio you posted above as a given.

I still think that Obama is a better campaigner, his policies are better, his team is more crafty/insightful, and his ground game is vastly superior.

Your narrative that figures McCrack ahead I think is actually a positive development--basically because it alarms a large number of people that easily tend to think that O-man has this election in the bag  (ok, people like me).   These folks will definately be more inclined to donate money and more agressively involve themselves in the campaign going into the homestretch.

McCrack's appearance at the Brokeback Mt.Church certainly did achieve a solidification of the Rep. base behind McCrack.  This was the calculated benefit from this venue.

No, I am not really worried.  I desparately want Obama to win, and will do what I can.

However, barring outright fraud, if a skilled left-of-center politico like Obama can't win this election in the face of deep economic problems and a substantial decline in US global prestige--well, that just means that the population is asking for more pain.   If O-man loses because of the deep racial fears and white priviledge here in the US, what the hell does that say about the US?

Anyway, again, I will do my best and project my best hopes that my fellow citizens can look at policies, and the historical record of the Bush administration.

By the way, there seems to be some massive head-faking toward Bayh (according to Yahoo News).

I will consolidate behind whomever Obama chooses at this point--even the vile Hillary.

You all know the types of VP that I would prefer--but I have to say that I am a bit disconcerted that this race is even close at this juncture.   But if anyone can pull ahead and win, it is Obama.

The corporate media don't want Obama (though the majority of the straight reporters may)--and they want to focus on the horserace elements of the campaign to boost profits.

Reply

Our Policy on Comment Submissions: Co-publishers of Narco News (which includes The Narcosphere and The Field) may post comments without moderation. All co-publishers comment under their real name, have contributed resources or volunteer labor to this project, have filled out this application and agreed to some simple guidelines about commenting.

Narco News has recently opened its comments section for submissions to moderated comments (that’s this box, here) by everybody else. More than 95 percent of all submitted comments are typically approved, because they are on-topic, coherent, don’t spread false claims or rumors, don’t gratuitously insult other commenters, and don’t engage in commerce, spam or otherwise hijack the thread. Narco News reserves the right to reject any comment for any reason, so, especially if you choose to comment anonymously, the burden is on you to make your comment interesting and relevant. That said, as you can see, hundreds of comments are approved each week here. Good luck in your comment submission!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

User login