User login
Navigation
Reporters' Notebooks
- Brenda Norrell
- Allan Brauer
- Kristin Bricker
- Okke Ornstein
- Bill Conroy
- Miguel Contreras
- Charlie Hardy
- Marc Van Riper
- RJ Maccani
- John Viescas
- Christopher Fee
- Gregory Berger
- Katie Halper
- Jessica Davies
- Don Henry Ford Jr.
- Benjamin Melançon
- John Slade
- Dennes Longoria
- Diana Barahona
- Romina Trincheri
- Erich Moncada
- Jay J. Johnson-Castro Sr.
- Narco News
- Al Giordano
- Mark Smith
- Daniel Fleming
- Nick Cooper
- Dan Feder
- Stephen Peacock
- Laura del Castillo
- Charles Mostoller
- Jeb Sprague
- David B. Briones
- Aaron Shuman
- Nancy Davies
- John Bruning
- Marcos Meconi
- Keith Yearman
- Jonathan Mills
- Cindy Lou Wilmore
- Sean Donahue
- Juan Trujillo
- Jeff Simpson
- Paul Henry
- George Salzman
- Christopher Whalen
- Simon Fitzgerald
- Wim Dankbaar
- Charles Faris
- Diego Mantilla
- Shawn O'Bryant
- Christopher Hyde
- David Keating
- Rich Gibson
- Anthony Fenton
- Steve Young
- Richard Pilkington
- Tatiana Ovando
- Jeremy Gordon
- Ricardo Sala
- Randall White
- Luis Gomez
- Teofilo Ballve
- Ben Masel
- Walt Lyford
- Jeremy Bigwood
- John F. Eden
- Irene Roca Ortiz
- Ron Smith
- Kevin Skerrett
- Jean Friedsky
- Gissel Gonzales
- María Eugenia Flores Castro
- José Mirtenbaum
- Manuela Aldabe
- Kevin Gallagher
- Bill Weaver
- Justin Delacour
- Claudia Espinoza
- Andrew Stelzer
- Reber Boult
- Colleen Glynn
- Mike DAllaire
- Jennifer Whitney
- Stan Gotlieb
- Alex Satanovsky
- Marcel Miranda
- Nate Johnson
- Richard Eramian
- Pablo Mamani
- Paul Silvester
- Franz J.T. Lee
- Chris Herz
- Andrei Tudor
- Nora Callahan
- Gurujiwan Khalsa
- Julia Steinberger
- Fabio Mesquita
- Yasmin Khan
- Pablo Francischelli
- Baylen Linnekin
- Erik Siegrist
- Natalia Viana
- Amber Howard
- Linda Langness
- Kevin Okabe
- Sarah de Haro


60 Minutes Responds (I didn't make this up)
Submitted November 19, 2004 - 1:44 am by Al GiordanoShe wrote:
The article she cites as worthy of a "TV version" is, as she glowed, from The Independent of London.
Wanna guess what this supposed "highly respected" newspaper's article about Rio de Janeiro is titled?
It is titled:
The City of Cocaine and Carnage.
I swear I'm not making this up!
The October 12, 2004 article by Tom Phillips and Thais Villela is available only by subscription over at the Independent website.
Yes, this is the same Independent of London that had the honor of publishing, last August 16th, the only story on earth that reported that Venezuela President Hugo Chavez had "lost" a recall referendum when, in fact, he had won with 59-percent of the vote.
(The newspaper, again embarrassed by one of its Latin American correspondents, had to dump the bad reporter and hire our own Reed Lindsay to correct the record, but only after an international outcry led by Ron Smith and others here at Narco News.)
However, this latest story, calling Rio de Janeiro "The City of Cocaine and Carnage," really exceeds the August 16th blunder in high-blown deceptive rhetoric, sensationalism, and fiction-posing-as-news.
Here are some excerpts from the story that 60 Minutes wants to turn into a "TV version."
Got it?
Extra! Extra! Read all about it! City of Carnage and Death! A city without a future! See the drug trafficker feed his enemies to a live alligator! Tour the human microwave made of car tires! They're not just "poor black people" - they have cellphones! It's Chechnya! It's Sudan! It's the Gaza Strip! All rolled into one! Tune in to "60 Minutes" and don't miss all the reasons why you should live in fear of drugs and poor people! It must be true: The Independent of London said so! A "well respected" newspaper! And an award-winning TV magazine show! Together to make you afraid, very afraid!
The article asks no questions about what causes the violence it reports, and therefore provides no answers.
Worse, is that non-governmental do-gooder organizations participated in this travesty against the truth The Commercial Media calls them and they jump Being their "guides" and "translators" for sensational and untrue stories like this one... Because, after all, when they get their names in "well respected" newspapers like the Independent, it gets them more attention and hopefully money from people who are afraid, very afraid, of "poor black people with cell phones! And drugs! And alligators!"
Pay no attention to the policy behind the curtain. The Mighty "Respected Newspaper" has spoken! And now the Mighty "Award Winning TV Magazine Show" wants to add its signal to the echo chamber...
Never mind that sensationalist drug war stories like this don't reflect reality or truth... What about the ratings? The journalist's career prospects? The need to keep the viewer scared or titilated to get him to stay through the next advertisements?
And the good people of Rio de Janeiro - a city that very much has a future, despite the "respected newspaper's" yellow conclusions - are dumped on once again by a Commercial Media for whom ratings and profits drive the collection and "reporting" of "news."
(I can hear the do-gooders saying, "Oh, but wouldn't it have been worse if we hadn't cooperated with them?" To that I answer: How could it possibly have turned out any worse than it did?)
I have a better idea. Send video cameras to the youths of Rocinha and other favelas in Rio... and invite them to cover the coming Civil War in Journalism through their eyes and experiences.
That would be a show I'd like to watch.