User login
Navigation
Reporters' Notebooks
- Brenda Norrell
- Allan Brauer
- Kristin Bricker
- Okke Ornstein
- Bill Conroy
- Miguel Contreras
- Charlie Hardy
- Marc Van Riper
- RJ Maccani
- John Viescas
- Christopher Fee
- Gregory Berger
- Katie Halper
- Jessica Davies
- Don Henry Ford Jr.
- Benjamin Melançon
- John Slade
- Dennes Longoria
- Diana Barahona
- Romina Trincheri
- Erich Moncada
- Jay J. Johnson-Castro Sr.
- Narco News
- Al Giordano
- Mark Smith
- Daniel Fleming
- Nick Cooper
- Dan Feder
- Stephen Peacock
- Laura del Castillo
- Charles Mostoller
- Jeb Sprague
- David B. Briones
- Aaron Shuman
- Nancy Davies
- John Bruning
- Marcos Meconi
- Keith Yearman
- Jonathan Mills
- Cindy Lou Wilmore
- Sean Donahue
- Juan Trujillo
- Jeff Simpson
- Paul Henry
- George Salzman
- Christopher Whalen
- Simon Fitzgerald
- Wim Dankbaar
- Charles Faris
- Diego Mantilla
- Shawn O'Bryant
- Christopher Hyde
- David Keating
- Rich Gibson
- Anthony Fenton
- Steve Young
- Richard Pilkington
- Tatiana Ovando
- Jeremy Gordon
- Ricardo Sala
- Randall White
- Luis Gomez
- Teofilo Ballve
- Ben Masel
- Walt Lyford
- Jeremy Bigwood
- John F. Eden
- Irene Roca Ortiz
- Ron Smith
- Kevin Skerrett
- Jean Friedsky
- Gissel Gonzales
- María Eugenia Flores Castro
- José Mirtenbaum
- Manuela Aldabe
- Kevin Gallagher
- Bill Weaver
- Justin Delacour
- Claudia Espinoza
- Andrew Stelzer
- Reber Boult
- Colleen Glynn
- Mike DAllaire
- Jennifer Whitney
- Stan Gotlieb
- Alex Satanovsky
- Marcel Miranda
- Nate Johnson
- Richard Eramian
- Pablo Mamani
- Paul Silvester
- Franz J.T. Lee
- Chris Herz
- Andrei Tudor
- Nora Callahan
- Gurujiwan Khalsa
- Julia Steinberger
- Fabio Mesquita
- Yasmin Khan
- Pablo Francischelli
- Baylen Linnekin
- Erik Siegrist
- Natalia Viana
- Amber Howard
- Linda Langness
- Kevin Okabe
- Sarah de Haro


Threat to capitalism after all?
Submitted December 6, 2004 - 11:02 pm by Benjamin MelançonBut it points to something definitely weird about today's repression: it doesn't appear to be a reaction to anything. The "non-fascist" repression cited in the article are most prominently the investigations, infiltrations, prosecution, and worse of any group left of liberal following both world wars. Prior to these reactionary crackdowns was a strong and growing progressive movement that, in both cases, even won lots of concessionary reforms in labor laws and social welfare and more.
So what's this repression, which is getting there in magnitude, responding to if there really is no threat to capitalism, not even the 60s and 70s radicalism that brought COINTELPRO?
Either the threat that the neoconservatives behind the Bush administration see is capitalism in its present form failing all by itself, with no alternative threatening, or it is the global anticapitalism described in We Are Everywhere. Or more probably, some combination of that and more.
Anyhow, I don't put much stock in the no threat to capitalism theory of 'no fascism'. I think Marxist analysis would have capitalism due for another major self-imposed crisis by now anyway, wouldn't it?