User login
Navigation
Reporters' Notebooks
- Don Henry Ford Jr.
- Marc Van Riper
- Jessica Davies
- Kristin Bricker
- Brenda Norrell
- Andrew Stelzer
- Christopher Fee
- Maggie Von Vogt
- Al Giordano
- Bill Conroy
- Allan Brauer
- Okke Ornstein
- Miguel Contreras
- Charlie Hardy
- RJ Maccani
- John Viescas
- Gregory Berger
- Katie Halper
- Benjamin Melançon
- John Slade
- Dennes Longoria
- Diana Barahona
- Romina Trincheri
- Erich Moncada
- Jay J. Johnson-Castro Sr.
- Narco News
- Mark Smith
- Daniel Fleming
- Nick Cooper
- Dan Feder
- Stephen Peacock
- Laura del Castillo
- Charles Mostoller
- Jeb Sprague
- David B. Briones
- Aaron Shuman
- Nancy Davies
- John Bruning
- Marcos Meconi
- Keith Yearman
- Jonathan Mills
- Cindy Lou Wilmore
- Sean Donahue
- Juan Trujillo
- Jeff Simpson
- Paul Henry
- George Salzman
- Christopher Whalen
- Simon Fitzgerald
- Wim Dankbaar
- Charles Faris
- Diego Mantilla
- Shawn O'Bryant
- Christopher Hyde
- David Keating
- Rich Gibson
- Anthony Fenton
- Steve Young
- Richard Pilkington
- Tatiana Ovando
- Jeremy Gordon
- Ricardo Sala
- Randall White
- Luis Gomez
- Teofilo Ballve
- Ben Masel
- Walt Lyford
- Jeremy Bigwood
- John F. Eden
- Irene Roca Ortiz
- Ron Smith
- Kevin Skerrett
- Jean Friedsky
- Gissel Gonzales
- María Eugenia Flores Castro
- José Mirtenbaum
- Manuela Aldabe
- Kevin Gallagher
- Bill Weaver
- Justin Delacour
- Claudia Espinoza
- Reber Boult
- Colleen Glynn
- Mike DAllaire
- Jennifer Whitney
- Stan Gotlieb
- Alex Satanovsky
- Marcel Miranda
- Nate Johnson
- Richard Eramian
- Pablo Mamani
- Paul Silvester
- Franz J.T. Lee
- Chris Herz
- Andrei Tudor
- Nora Callahan
- Gurujiwan Khalsa
- Julia Steinberger
- Fabio Mesquita
- Yasmin Khan
- Pablo Francischelli
- Baylen Linnekin
- Erik Siegrist
- Natalia Viana
- Amber Howard
- Linda Langness
- Kevin Okabe
- Sarah de Haro


Weed wacking won't work in Prohibition
Submitted June 15, 2005 - 9:32 pm by Bill ConroyThe Houston Chronicle earlier this week reported the following:
However, one Department of Homeland Security law enforcer along the border raises an interesting question: If the "bad" Mexican cops are weeded out, who does that really help?
First, some background, as previously reported by Narco News:
So with that backdrop in mind, the DHS law enforcer adds this bit of intel to the soup:
Now, back to what Narco News reported previously about the situation in Nuevo Laredo:
In other words, the action by Fox to take back control of the local Mexican police force in Nuevo Laredo will, if successful, by consequence neutralize one of the many factions in the narco-capitalism market in Nuevo Laredo.
It is likely that most of the Mexican cops who are on the narco-take are playing on the side of Cardenas and the Zetas -- not such a stretch to accept because, after all, Guzman is the new kid on the block in Nuevo Laredo.
So, by clamping down on narco-corruption in the Mexican police force, doesn't Fox, by extension, increase the power of Guzman and his forces?
After all, somebody has been shooting Mexican cops in Nuevo Laredo in recent months, reportedly because those cops, just like in the days of Prohibition in the United States, were on the payroll of the narco-traffickers (bootleggers). If the power of the local cops in the narco-trade is diminished, someone will step into that vacuum, right? Those are the rules of narco-capitalism under Prohibition.
And like it or not, as long as Prohibition continues, the crooked cops taken off the streets today (on both sides of the border) are as replaceable as heroin addicts tomorrow.