User login
Navigation
Reporters' Notebooks
- Kristin Bricker
- Brenda Norrell
- Allan Brauer
- Okke Ornstein
- Bill Conroy
- Miguel Contreras
- Charlie Hardy
- Marc Van Riper
- RJ Maccani
- John Viescas
- Christopher Fee
- Gregory Berger
- Katie Halper
- Jessica Davies
- Don Henry Ford Jr.
- Benjamin Melançon
- John Slade
- Dennes Longoria
- Diana Barahona
- Romina Trincheri
- Erich Moncada
- Jay J. Johnson-Castro Sr.
- Narco News
- Al Giordano
- Mark Smith
- Daniel Fleming
- Nick Cooper
- Dan Feder
- Stephen Peacock
- Laura del Castillo
- Charles Mostoller
- Jeb Sprague
- David B. Briones
- Aaron Shuman
- Nancy Davies
- John Bruning
- Marcos Meconi
- Keith Yearman
- Jonathan Mills
- Cindy Lou Wilmore
- Sean Donahue
- Juan Trujillo
- Jeff Simpson
- Paul Henry
- George Salzman
- Christopher Whalen
- Simon Fitzgerald
- Wim Dankbaar
- Charles Faris
- Diego Mantilla
- Shawn O'Bryant
- Christopher Hyde
- David Keating
- Rich Gibson
- Anthony Fenton
- Steve Young
- Richard Pilkington
- Tatiana Ovando
- Jeremy Gordon
- Ricardo Sala
- Randall White
- Luis Gomez
- Teofilo Ballve
- Ben Masel
- Walt Lyford
- Jeremy Bigwood
- John F. Eden
- Irene Roca Ortiz
- Ron Smith
- Kevin Skerrett
- Jean Friedsky
- Gissel Gonzales
- María Eugenia Flores Castro
- José Mirtenbaum
- Manuela Aldabe
- Kevin Gallagher
- Bill Weaver
- Justin Delacour
- Claudia Espinoza
- Andrew Stelzer
- Reber Boult
- Colleen Glynn
- Mike DAllaire
- Jennifer Whitney
- Stan Gotlieb
- Alex Satanovsky
- Marcel Miranda
- Nate Johnson
- Richard Eramian
- Pablo Mamani
- Paul Silvester
- Franz J.T. Lee
- Chris Herz
- Andrei Tudor
- Nora Callahan
- Gurujiwan Khalsa
- Julia Steinberger
- Fabio Mesquita
- Yasmin Khan
- Pablo Francischelli
- Baylen Linnekin
- Erik Siegrist
- Natalia Viana
- Amber Howard
- Linda Langness
- Kevin Okabe
- Sarah de Haro


Plan Colombia Machine Powers Ahead in Washington
Submitted March 25, 2004 - 3:01 am by Ron SmithAgence France Presse provides some insight into the position of leading democrats and republicans on the issue of increasing and extending US Military aid to Colombia in the following article:
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/040325/1/3j0sl.html
El Espectador is also detailing the progress of lobbying for the increase,
http://www.elespectador.com/internacional/nota1.ht m
The bill is apparently in the Senate Armed Services Committee, and the reports are showing that it's a feel good session where all parties agree that Plan Colombia needs to continue. There seems to be no discussion in the hallowed halls of the capitol of the risks of continuing and increasing US military aid to Colombia's military. It seems that the vote will happen after the election and Bill Delahunt, according to the AFP, is waiting to pass judgement until after the election, although it seems unlikely that "Bush-Lite" would have a different position on Colombia than the current administration. It seems to be beyond the cognitive capacity of decision-makers in Washinton that getting more deeply embroiled in Colombia's 40-year civil war could have negative results. The fact is that continued and increased US involvement can only result in US casualties and exponentially more Colombian casualties. As in the 1980's, US policy is driven by a need to appear "tough" on the enemy of the moment. As the US entangled itself in Central America, supporting the side of the wealthy and the violent, the United States seems bent on exacerbating the conflict, all to support short term corporate interests.