Mexican AG Resigns as Fox Backs Down from Electoral Coup
When Lucio Gutiérrez stood for president in 2002, he promised such a change, a new path for Ecuador to end the country’s subservience to U.S. economic and military policies and take power out of the hands of the domestic oligarchy. But Gutiérrez instead deepened the country’s neoliberal economic program and cozied up to the Bush administration, counting on the hope that his constituents and allies would keep their mouths shut out of loyalty. It’s an old trick used often in Latin American history. But the Ecuadorian people didn’t turn a blind eye this time, and the president was forced to flee as the people rose up and filled the streets of the capital.
As many readers have probably already seen, Mexican President Vicente Fox suddenly backed down this week from the “desafuero,” his crusade to haul popular Mexico City governor Andres Manuel López Obrador into court and therefore bar him from running for president next year. He too, like Gutiérrez, thought the people had become passive after they voted him into office, but a million protesters outside his office on Sunday proved him wrong... Just over three years since a military coup was foiled by the people in Venezuela, a pre-electoral coup has been blocked by the masses in Mexico. On Wednesday night, Fox announced on live TV that Rafael Macedo, the attorney general that he appointed upon becoming president (at Washington’s behest) and who had led the legal process against López Obrador, had “resigned.” He further announced that:
“The Justice Department (procuraduría) will exhaustively review the process against the Mexico City head of government, looking to best preserve the political harmony of the country within the framework of the law.“As president, one of my greatest concerns has been to broaden the political rights of the citizens, and adapt our legislation to international law.”
Fox has now lost what remained of his credibility. He was voted into office riding on promises to end the impunity and corruption that had characterized the 70-year rule of the PRI, opening up and democratizing the country. As the years went by, Mexicans began to realize that in many areas Fox was as bad or worse than his PRI predecessors. Presidential corruption scandals continued apace. And now, the man who had supposedly broken the ruling party’s grip on politics and opened the system to all, was trying to prevent the most popular presidential hopeful from even running, with the vital help of the PRI itself.
His claim throughout the process had been that the desafuero was necessary to preserve the rule of law that he had ushered in, insuring that “no one is above the law” (Fox and Macedo, of course, had committed the same common, minor offense – ignoring a court order – for which they were stripping López Obrador of his political rights). Now, incredibly, he claims that Macedo’s resignation and the almost-certain abandonment of the charges against López Obrador represent the defense of democracy and the rule of law. Huh?
Anyway, the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) is understandably freaked out. Without the López Obrador factor, the PRI is the most likely to win the presidency and regain its domination of the federal government. Many Mexicans are completely disillusioned with electoral politics after the experience of Fox. Without an exciting newcomer like López Obrador, they will stay home in 2006, leaving the PRI’s loyal base, cultivated over 70 years of political bullying, to vote in their man.
PRI leader and likely presidential candidate Roberto Madrazo lashed out in a press conference yesterday at Fox’s betrayal of their common cause:
“This is the moment to tell [the president] clearly, firmly, and respectfully, that the country’s domestic politics are in chaos, and unfortunately its external politics as well. Mr. President, dedicate yourself to resolving the country’s problems, think more about Mexico. Stay away from controversy, do not get involved with electoral issues, do not complicate this process as you have already sufficiently complicated national life.”
Trying to save face, Madrazo continued by claiming that there would be “no political cost for the PRI” and that “I have always said that I would like to see the governor on the ballot. The party is prepared for that and I am sure that we will beat him in the elections.” What Madrazo objected to, he said, was the “chaos” and “ungovernability” in which Fox had placed the country.
That “chaos” that Madrazo so fears is the long-overdue expression of the true democratic aspirations of the Mexican people. A oft-heard comment in coverage of the march that pushed Fox into ending his crusade was that many were not marching for López Obrador himself so much as against the ugly politics that the people have so clearly rejected in the past. In this way, though the political context is very different, the marchers had in mind the same feelings as the “forajidos” in Ecuador, and those all over América who have struggled as part of the political changes sweeping Latin America.
The U.S. State Department has still had nothing to say so far about all of this upheaval right next door. While Condoleezza Rice travels around South America to shower praise on Colombia’s Uribe and voice her “concern” over other governments’ moves towards regional integration and independence from foreign domination (more on that later…), all State has to say about Mexico comes in the form of more shrill travel warnings about the threat to U.S. citizens from narcos across the border.
Developing…
Email this page
Madrazo blew it on this one
Submitted on April 30th, 2005 by Jules SiegelAs I said in my diary on the nuclear option, if López Obrador runs and wins big, the remmnants of the PRI will probably be absorbed into the PRD, and we will be back where we started in 1987 when Cardenas and his followers were ejected -- only now the rightful heirs of the PRI and the Mexican revolution will be running the show.
I don't know. Don't hold your breath would seem to be the best advice right now.
Meanwhile, let's not forget what the Mexican revolution accomplished against all odds.
I am really annoyed about the arrest of Cancun environmentalist Araceli Dominguez on absurd defamation charges, so I will have to slow down and breathe. This could never have happened under Zedillo. This is what Fox gave Cancun -- the business. Are you reading this, Al? Fox has been an environmental disaster for Cancun. Is López Obrador going to be any better?
I will get back to this later. Meanwhile, see:
In response to a query this morning, I received the following reply from ecoTerra:
Don't know why Fox
Submitted on April 30th, 2005 by Don Henry Ford Jr.Maybe Fox feared an uprising of the people. Or experiencing the same fate as the president of Ecuador. Then again, maybe he finally realized it was the right thing to do.
Either way, it is all to easy to lay all the blame on one man, in this case Fox, when he is surrounded by so many others with personal agendas.
Don't think this AG just quit for the hell of it. Fox ousted his ass. Or so it appears to me.
Now let's hope that Mexico doesn't switch to voting machines without any paper trail like their neighbor to the North.
El fiscal general mexicano renuncia
Submitted on May 2nd, 2005 by Dan FederLa clase política de este hemisferio recibió un rotundo mensaje este mes: si prometan romper con lo viejo –virar el país hacia un nuevo camino, gobernar para el pueblo en vez de la elite corrupta– más les vale cumplirlo.
Cuando Lucio Gutiérrez se postuló para presidente en 2002 prometió cambios enormes: un sendero para que el Ecuador terminara con su servilismo ante las políticas militares y económicas de los Estados Unidos y arrebatar el poder de las manos de la oligarquía nacional. En cambio Gutiérrez agudizó el programa económico neoliberal y se acurrucó en la administración Bush, con la esperanza de que los electores y aliados mantendrían sus bocas calladas por lealtad. Es un viejo truco empleado en la historia de Latinoamérica. Pero en esta ocasión el pueblo ecuatoriano no fue cómplice y el presidente fue obligado a huir mientras la gente se levantaba y abarrotaba las calles de la capital.
Como muchos de los lectores han visto, esta semana el presidente mexicano Vicente Fox se desistió súbitamente del desafuero, su cruzada en las cortes para remover al popular gobernante de la Ciudad de México, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, para evitar que contienda para la presidencia el próximo año. Fox, como Gutiérrez, pensó que el pueblo se había vuelto pasivo después de que lo ayudó a entrar al gobierno, pero un millón de manifestantes que se congregaron el domingo afuera de su oficina le enseñó su error.
Después de sólo tres años desde que un golpe militar fue detenido por la gente de Venezuela, un golpe preelectoral fue evitado por las masas de México. La noche del miércoles Fox anunció en vivo por la televisión que Rafael Macedo de la Concha, el procurador general designado al asumir la presidencia (con el beneplácito de Washington) y que llevó el caso legal contra López Obrador, había “renunciado”. También anunció que:
Fox ha perdido la poca credibilidad que le quedaba. Fue electo presidente por sus promesas de acabar con la impunidad y la corrupción que caracterizaron el dominio de setenta años del PRI, abriendo y democratizando el país. Conforme avanzaron los años los mexicanos se dieron cuenta que en muchas áreas Fox era malo o peor que sus predecesores del PRI. Los escándalos de corrupción presidencial fueron constantes. Y ahora el hombre que supuestamente rompió con el monopolio político del partido gobernante y abrió el sistema para todos, trató de evitar que se lanzara el más popular aspirante presidencial, con la ayuda vital del mismo PRI.
A lo largo de todo el proceso aseguró que el desafuero era necesario para preservar el dominio de la ley que tanto había prometido, al asegurar que “nadie está sobre la ley”. Desde luego, Fox y Macedo han cometido el mismo tipo de delitos menores y comunes, al ignorar la orden de un juez. Y ahora, increíblemente, aseguró que la renuncia de Macedo y el abandono casi seguro de los cargos contra López Obrador representaba la defensa de la democracia y el dominio del estado de derecho. ¿Eh?
En fin, es de esperarse que el Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) esté nervioso. Sin el factor de López Obrador es seguro que el PRI gane la presidencia y recupere el dominio del gobierno federal. Muchos mexicanos están completamente desilusionados con la política electoral después de la experiencia de Fox. Sin un candidato excitante como López Obrador, se quedarán en sus casas en el 2006, permitiendo que las fieles bases del PRI, cultivadas a lo largo de setenta años de abusos políticos, voten por su hombre.
El líder del PRI y seguro candidato presidencial, Roberto Madrazo, fulmigó contra a Fox y su traición de su causa común:
Para salvar su imagen Madrazo continuó asegurando que no habrían “costos políticos para el PRI” y que “siempre he dicho que preferiría ver al alcalde en las boletas. El partido está preparado para hacerlo y estoy seguro que lo venceremos en las elecciones”. Madrazo se quejó por el “caos” y la “ingobernabilidad” provocados por Fox al país.
Ese “caos” que tanto teme Madrazo es la tan negada expresión de las aspiraciones democráticas del pueblo mexicano. Un comentario muy escuchado en la cobertura de la marcha que obligó a Fox terminar con su cruzada, fue que muchos no apoyaban a López Obrador necesariamente, sino que marcharon en contra del feo rostro de la política que tanto repudiaron en el pasado. En esta ocasión, aunque el contexto político es muy diferente, los manifestantes tenían en mente los mismos sentimientos de los forajidos del Ecuador, y de todas las personas que en América han luchado como parte de los cambios políticos que barren Latinoamérica.
El Departamento de Estado norteamericano todavía no tiene nada que decir sobre este tumulto en la casa del vecino de al lado. Mientras Condoleezza Rice viaja por Sudamérica para llenar de alabanzas a Uribe de Colombia y ventilar su “preocupación” por los movimientos de los gobiernos para acercarse a una integración regional y a la independencia de la dominación extranjera (más de eso luego…), todo lo que el Departamento tiene que decir sobre México viene en la presentación de una estridente advertencia para los viajeros estadounidenses, sobre la amenaza de los narcotraficantes en la frontera.
La historia sigue desarrollándose…