Language

Reporter's Notebook: Al Giordano

Nuevo Laredo: Martial Law as Media Stunt in the Failed War on Drugs

"We are not in the era of Al Capone and Prohibition.”

- Slain Police Chief Alejandro Domínguez Cuello, prior to his death

It’s a wet dream for Commercial Media journalists: The new police chief of the Mexican border city of Nuevo Laredo took office last Wednesday. Nine hours later he was gunned down. US Ambassador to Mexico Tony Garza quickly issued a press release harping a song of I-told-you-so: ““A few weeks ago, I asked the State Department to re-issue a public announcement about the on-going violence in the border region.”

By Saturday, Mexican President Vicente Fox sent in a convoy of federal police who, on an access road to a country club near the city, ended up in a shootout with local police. Newspaper editorialists salivated: “Until Mexico takes aggressive measures to fight crime and combat the violence that has spilled into the streets, the country will remain unsafe for residents and tourists,” lectures one such boilerplate text in the San Antonio Express-News, which in a careless turn of the pen declares “the country” – an entire nation, not just the border city – unsafe.

But as a US Customs agent admitted yesterday in a rare moment of candor, none of this grand show of force is going to make anybody any safer… The story of Nuevo Laredo under Martial Law makes for a great motion picture, putting even Soderbergh to shame, and causes lots of huffing and puffing by the press corps feeling courageous as its members take official dictation from hotel rooms along the border. Not one of them, yet, has investigated or asked questions about the systemic causes of the violence. And why would they? The Commercial Media loves the violence! It sells papers, boosts ratings, and will no doubt bring awards to the worst offenders among the professional simulators.

Fox, on Monday, sent in the Armed Forces to occupy the city, rounding up 720 police officers for interrogation, subjecting them to polygraph and urine tests for drugs, taking away their cell phones but apparently not, in the case of one who the attorney general’s office claims killed himself while he was interrogated last night, their guns.

But according to at least one candid agent of the US Department of Homeland Security’s Burea of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), all this expenditure and muscle ain’t gonna make anybody safer.

"When the Mexican government puts pressure on them, it's like a fumigator, and they'll come across the border like cockroaches," said Al Peña, who heads criminal investigations for the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement,” reports the Houston Chronicle. The agent, of course, for the sake of his job security, had to then backpedal and put a smiley face on it all: “I think we are coming to see something positive, but it's unfortunate that all these people have died to get where we are.”

It’s the Prohibition, Stupid

The slain police chief, Alejandro Domínguez Coello told reporters last January: “"We are not in the era of Al Capone and Prohibition.” Yeah. Right. There’s a fitting epitaph for his tombstone.

But in at least one sense, the late police chief had a point: During the era of alcohol prohibition in the United States (1918-1933), unlike today, Mexico did not adhere to the policy. As the website Tijuana.com, of another famous Mexican border city, recounts:

“In 1917, San Diego banned cabaret dancing. Tijuana capitalized on this idiocy by building scores of cabarets and casinos. By now the fledging community of Hollywood had heard all about Tijuana and its irresistibly short three hour drive down the California coast. That trek soon became a pilgrimage when, in 1920, the United States launched Prohibition and outlawed alcoholic beverages. Tijuana gladly welcomed America's thirsty citizens with open arms that have never closed and a nightlife that never sleeps!”

Nuevo Laredo, until very recently, had a hopping nightlife, just like Tijuana (in a large part because of overly strict "drinking age" laws and enforcement on the US side of the border). But as that city’s daily El Mañana reports today: “The Golden Era for Restaurants Is Over.” Cheesy Tex-Mex bars like “Señor Frog’s” (of the “Carlos & Charlie’s” chain) that are favorite gringo watering holes have shut their doors in Nuevo Laredo’s historic center, ever since US State Department “travel advisories” began frightening the Texans away.

“Our clientele is 80 percent North American and 20 percent national,” Pablo Longoria, manager of the Dorado restaurant in Nuevo Laredo told El Mañana. “You can see the situation as it is today: there are no clients.”

Once again, Mexico bears the brunt of the US-imposed “War on Drugs” and we have Martial Law in Nuevo Laredo. National Mexican political columnist Carlos Ramírez wonders aloud today if this latest maneuver “could mean the first step toward a Plan Colombia for Mexico.”

The hammer slams down upon Nuevo Laredo, today an occupied city. But for as long as governments uphold a policy of prohibition on drugs (instead of the kinds of regulations that, since 1933, ended the similar violence that once surrounded the former prohibition on alcohol in the United States), narco-trafficking, and all the gangland violence it brings, will march on.

It’s like the golf ball under the rug: Swat it down in Nuevo Laredo, and, as the aforementioned Homeland Security agent admitted, it will just pop up somewhere else.

Mexico doesn’t need a “Plan Colombia.” She needs a “Plan Tijuana” of the kind she had in the 1920s. When it comes to the drug war, Mexico is a battered wife. She needs a divorce from the brutal prohibition that a shotgun wedding with US drug policy has historically imposed upon her.

Comments

Dalls Morning News

ran a front page article on the subject today. Even quoted me in one spot.

Here are the links:

Tracey Eaton

Alberto Corchado

DIANNE SOLÍS

Eaton Asks the Right Questions

Thanks, Don.

I spoke too soon when I wrote that "not one" of the Commercial Media reporters had questioned the underlying, systemic, causes of all this violence and circus. Your link to Tracey Eaton's story shows that one indeed has. Eaton writes:

U.S.-MEXICO BORDER – Since the 1970s, Mexican authorities have periodically launched splashy anti-drug operations like the one now being carried out in Nuevo Laredo and 13 other cities.

But these high-profile raids – often involving hundreds of federal agents and soldiers – have had virtually no long-term impact, drug-trade specialists say.

"The whole history of anti-drug sweeps in Mexico is that eventually the sweepers get converted," said Charles Bowden, author of Down by the River and other acclaimed books about the drug business. "They join the traffickers. Nothing changes except there are more drugs – and they're cheaper."

Mexico's anti-drug operations usually produce short-term results. Gang members and mafia soldiers are jailed. Drugs are seized. And homes, businesses and shiny cars owned by the traffickers are confiscated.

But experts say the government's efforts – such as the show of force on Sunday and Monday following the assassination last week of Nuevo Laredo's new police chief – barely make a dent in what's become a multibillion-dollar industry.

Don Henry Ford, author of Contrabando: Confessions of a Drug-Smuggling Texas Cowboy, said Mexico's drug economy has multiplied since the 1980s, when he smuggled marijuana.
"The money is just too big now," he said. "There's no way the government's going to stop it. And they can't afford to. If all that money were to dry up, it would literally cause a wave of people trying to get out of there. It would break the nation."

Complicating matters: Many of those in law enforcement are corrupt, he said.

After the Mexican army raided his marijuana plantation in the 1980s, he said, soldiers forced the field workers to finish packaging the drugs so they'd have an easier time reselling it later...

One of the first high-profile drug sweeps in Mexico was Operation Condor, which lasted from 1975 to 1985.

Some 10,000 soldiers under the command of Mexican Gen. José Hernández Toledo were sent to Sinaloa, Durango and Chihuahua states to destroy the drug crops there.

Gen. Hernández "predicted the end of drug trafficking in six months," Mexican sociologist Luis Astorga said. But he failed. Peasants terrified of the soldiers fled to other states along with many of the traffickers.

The drug trade spread. Prices in the U.S. went up temporarily, but the flow of marijuana and other drugs into Texas and other states continued unabated.

Carlos Aguilar Garza, the attorney general's front man during Operation Condor, "became a drug trafficker himself years later and was assassinated in 1993," Mr. Astorga said.

"Hundreds of people were arrested, tortured and sent to jail" during Operation Condor, "but not a single big boss" was among them, Mr. Astorga said. And by the time it was over, most of the drug lords moved to Guadalajara and "continued their business on a bigger scale."

Hoping to get trafficking under control, the Mexican government named a general to head the top anti-drug agency.

Gen. Jesus Gutierrez Rebollo carried out a crackdown of his own until he was arrested in February 1997 and charged with protecting the late Amado Carrillo Fuentes, then the country's top trafficker...

Since then, things have only gotten worse, drug-trade experts say.

The North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, has driven many legitimate Mexican farmers out of business, and many have turned to drug cultivation, Mr. Bowden said. "It's one of the unintended consequences of NAFTA," Mr. Bowden said...

Despite key arrests, experts say making meaningful progress remains an uphill battle because illicit drugs have become such an important part of the Mexican economy. Said (former DEA agent Cele) Castillo: "We are more addicted to drug money than we are to drugs."

Now, that's journalism! Hats off to Tracey Eaton of the Dallas Morning News for going against the tide of lazy official reporting.

Violence as a Mexican nears the US Border

I am myself a mexican-gringo and I recognize that drug perception needs to be transformed on both sides of the border, but I cannot avoid joking about these violent northern border of us Mexicans. Heck, we send these gringos our work- and family-loving Mexicans through the border and they send us back all the violence from their ashamed drug-consuming and drug-warring habits!

Weed wacking won't work in Prohibition

If you send in an army to cut down the weeds, but leave the roots, what do you expect to grow back?

The Houston Chronicle earlier this week reported the following:

Hundreds of Mexican troops and federal agents detained the entire Nuevo Laredo police force Monday, part of a wider operation launched by President Vicente Fox to contain the nation's drug-related violence.

City and federal officials said the nearly 700 detained officers will be tested for illegal narcotics use, subjected to detailed background checks and interrogated by federal officials before they are reinstated.

The mass detention of the police force followed Wednesday's assassination of the city's new police chief and the wounding Saturday of a federal agent by police.

However, one Department of Homeland Security law enforcer along the border raises an interesting question: If the "bad" Mexican cops are weeded out, who does that really help?

First, some background, as previously reported by Narco News:

The two rival drug lords at the center of the turf war (in Nuevo Laredo) are allegedly Osiel Cardenas Guillen and Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman.

Cardenas, who has been in jail on drug charges in Mexico since 2003, reportedly oversees his narco-trafficking organization from prison. His group, often referred to in the mainstream press as the “Gulf cartel,” has controlled the Nuevo Laredo market for years.

Cardenas’ primary enforcers are the Zetas, a group composed (in part) of former elite Mexican military commandos who deserted their posts to take up arms as mercenaries in the narco-market.

However, in recent years, Guzman has made inroads into the Nuevo Laredo market by waging a bloody street war against the Cardenas organization and the Zetas.

So with that backdrop in mind, the DHS law enforcer adds this bit of intel to the soup:

... People are being killed 'cause they belong to either Z's (Zetas) or ... Guzman's gang.... Either you are with us or against us....

(The) chief either pissed off one side or the other or got too close to one side or the other ... most are on the take if not all.  

They (the Mexican government) did send about 1,500 storm troopers into Nuevo Laredo last week to clean and exterminate all bad elements.

Now, back to what Narco News reported previously about the situation in Nuevo Laredo:

... The truth is that no one really knows whose force has the upper hand, or how many players are really making a run at gaining a foothold in the Nuevo Laredo narco-market. The attrition rate is in constant flux in this the turf war – due to murders, double-crosses and pay-offs.

Zetas and other mercenary gangs are in the game for money and the power that brings. Loyalty in that world usually goes to the highest bidder. Also in the mix as partisans in the war are corrupt law enforcers, who also play for money.  In all cases, death is the ultimate referee.

The U.S. mainstream media focuses on the Mexican “cartels” and crooked Mexican cops in the war on drugs, but rest assured that the trail of corruption and death on that front extends across the border and follows the money north throughout the narco-trafficking pipeline.

In other words, the action by Fox to take back control of the local Mexican police force in Nuevo Laredo will, if successful, by consequence neutralize one of the many factions in the narco-capitalism market in Nuevo Laredo.

It is likely that most of the Mexican cops who are on the narco-take are playing on the side of Cardenas and the Zetas -- not such a stretch to accept because, after all, Guzman is the new kid on the block in Nuevo Laredo.

 So, by clamping down on narco-corruption in the Mexican police force, doesn't Fox, by extension, increase the power of Guzman and his forces?

After all, somebody has been shooting Mexican cops in Nuevo Laredo in recent months, reportedly because those cops, just like in the days of Prohibition in the United States, were on the payroll of the narco-traffickers (bootleggers). If the power of the local cops in the narco-trade is diminished, someone will step into that vacuum, right? Those are the rules of narco-capitalism under Prohibition.

And like it or not, as long as Prohibition continues, the crooked cops taken off the streets today (on both sides of the border) are as replaceable as heroin addicts tomorrow.

Border Police Chief Only Latest Casualty In Mexico

Read the whole piece here: WaPo

More Than 600 Killed This Year Despite Aggressive Crackdown

By Mary Jordan and Kevin Sullivan
Washington Post Foreign Service
Thursday, June 16, 2005

...In a recent interview, Fox likened Mexico's "explosion of organized crime killing" to the Al Capone era in Chicago. "Let's recall Chicago in the early '20s. I mean it took years to get rid of the mafias, it took years to get rid of organized crime," he said. Fox said U.S. and Mexican authorities were working jointly to confront criminals who control "millions and millions and millions of dollars."...

It took ending prohibition...

Yes Fox, let's recall Chicago in the early '20s.  It took ending Prohibition, not just "years" or repeated crackdowns, to end the "explosion of organized crime killing," and with new prohibited drugs to distribute the mafias and institutionalized crime was in fact never gotten rid of.

We apparently have to restate a theme common on the pages of Narco News, that the violence of the drug war will only stop with the end of the drug war and drug consumption will never be eliminated by violent prohibition.  More from the article Don Henry quoted:

Law enforcement officials trace the current violence to the Fox administration's arrests of 15 leaders of billion-dollar criminal organizations. Rivals have tried to move in and violently take over their territory. There have also been bloody battles within cartels, as lieutenants fight to move up the ladder because of new vacancies at the top, Mexican officials said.

Officials in Washington have continually praised the efforts of Fox, noting he has jailed more top cartel leaders than any Mexican president in history.  Since he took office, the Mexican government has arrested more than 46,000 people on drug charges, destroyed numerous clandestine landing strips and wiped out thousands of acres of poppy and marijuana fields.

And while no one quoted in the article is calling for the end of drug prohibition, some are connecting the dots:

A number of analysts have begun pointing out that Fox's much-applauded effort against drug traffickers has not reduced the supply of drugs reaching U.S. streets from Mexico. Instead, they said, all Mexico has gotten for its effort is more violence and a rapidly rising drug consumption problem.

"The good news is that there are more capos in jail; the bad news is that it doesn't change anything," said Jorge Chabat, an academic who studies justice issues. "There's no change in the amount of drugs available on the street, and you have more violence. The logical question is, 'What are we doing this for?'"

And the final reason sustained militarized police state attack on drug production and distribution "doesn't change anything" in Mexico OR the United States (where the violence from the drug war is worse and more indiscriminate if less showy at the moment) is almost impossible to ignore once lame-duck Presidente Vicente Fox says it: the illegal drug industry controls "millions and millions and millions of dollars," and politicians and authorities on both sides of the border undoubtedly get a piece.

Add comment

Our Policy on Comment Submissions: Co-publishers of Narco News (which includes The Narcosphere and The Field) may post comments without moderation. All co-publishers comment under their real name, have contributed resources or volunteer labor to this project, have filled out this application and agreed to some simple guidelines about commenting.

Narco News has recently opened its comments section for submissions to moderated comments (that’s this box, here) by everybody else. More than 95 percent of all submitted comments are typically approved, because they are on-topic, coherent, don’t spread false claims or rumors, don’t gratuitously insult other commenters, and don’t engage in commerce, spam or otherwise hijack the thread. Narco News reserves the right to reject any comment for any reason, so, especially if you choose to comment anonymously, the burden is on you to make your comment interesting and relevant. That said, as you can see, hundreds of comments are approved each week here. Good luck in your comment submission!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

User login

Reporters' Notebooks