All Notebook Entries
- Posted by Luis Gomez - January 25, 2005 at 7:27 pmAmong other things, the question that has echoed through my ears several times in the last few days is: what is the difference between the Aymara people those from the countryside and those who live in the city of El Alto and the autonomists from the city of Santa Cruz? Arent both groups saying and demanding the same thing as many of the movements in countries throughout Latin America autonomy to make decisions, referendums to decide our future? And to be honest, the answer is always the same: no, it is not the same thing. But lets look at that answer in more detail.
- Posted by Chris Herz - January 25, 2005 at 6:04 pmMy readers will know that no admirer of our US constitutional system am I. For its antique and anti-democratic, even racist features are an important element of the elitism that I believe has led us to our present sorry state.
- Posted by Richard Pilkington - January 25, 2005 at 2:11 pmWar possible in the next few years
By Carlos Alberto Montaner (subscription may be req'd)
Would friends in the Narcosphere care to dissect Mr. Montaner or, at least, his opinions?
- Posted by Luis Gomez - January 24, 2005 at 11:07 pmEntre otras cosas, la pregunta ha rebotado en mis oídos varias veces en los últimos días: ¿qué diferencia a los aymaras, a los del campo y a los de El Alto, de los autonomistas de la ciudad de Santa Cruz? ¿No es más o menos lo mismo que andan diciendo muchos moviemientos en varios países de América Latina: autonomía para decidir, referéndums para decidir nuestro destino? Y para ser sincero, la respuesta es siempre la misma: No, no es lo mismo. Ensayemos una respuesta más amplia...
- Posted by Al Giordano - January 24, 2005 at 3:55 pmAs Narco News - launched in April 2000 to report on the drug war and democracy from Latin America - enters its fifth year, we continue growing and evolving... 213 copublishers... a Narcosphere growing in volume and velocity... The Fund for Authentic Journalism... And with such growth come new opportunities.
As publisher, I spent most of the past year organizing and promoting the work of others - our copublishers, our journalists, our Authentic Journalism scholars and professors - as well as the hard work of freeing this newspaper from the pressures of wealthy interests.
But now I go back to being a reporter again. As of today, I am demoting myself to get back on the road in our América, to investigate, to write again, as a beat correspondent for this newspaper.
Today it is my pleasure to announce the new starting lineup for the newsroom, responsible for the work that appears on the front page of Narco News, and of course at your service here on The Narcosphere:
Acting Publisher: Luis A. Gómez
Managing Editor: Dan Feder
Editorial Columnist: Laura del Castillo Matamoros
Correspondent: Al Giordano
Presente: Gary Webb
A few more thoughts about these changes appear at the jump...
- Posted by Bill Conroy - January 23, 2005 at 4:40 amI thought some folks might enjoy this, and it might serve as a jumping off point for discussion about the history of the free press and its future. Strangely, in putting the following excerpts together, I find that history isnt really that long ago after all.
Anyway, Im not going to drag on here. Following are passages from a collection of books and publications about the history of the Underground Press of the 1960s. They are like pieces of a mosaic. So read through them all, if youre so inclined, to get the whole picture.
(The sources are at the end of the tale.)
Without freedom of speech I might be in the swamp. Bob Dylan
The Underground Press: A Mosaic History
An understandable world was coming apart at the seems appearance could not be trusted. The assassinations made no sense. Symbols of security against a communist threat the CIA and the FBI increasingly seemed a menace themselves. They were a source of anxiety and insecurity, not only for radical students, but for moderate legislators. Even President Lyndon Johnson was persuaded that the CIA was implicated in John Kennedys murder. Even the American flag changed its meaning and became more a partisan than a national symbol. (3)
- Posted by Chris Herz - January 22, 2005 at 11:48 amOur own opposition people, and the citizens of other lands whose lives are threatened, whose families are immiserated, owe it to themselves to examine the born again Fascism which has replaced liberal democracy in the USA. For this nation and its mendacious and nihilistic misleadership promise humanity catastrophe, war and sufferings beyond the wildest imaginings of the German, Italian or Japanese Fascists of past times.
- Posted by Benjamin Melançon - January 20, 2005 at 9:12 pmGeorge Salzman deserves better than this. But then, so does everyone in the world.
Before, on, and after the national election of November 2, the people of the United States and the world desperately needed honest reporting about the honesty or dishonesty of that election. Neither George Salzman nor I provided it. We weren't dishonest. We just didn't do the reporting. Nor did anyone else, including the people who are paid to do it.
I mention George by name, because he honors me with inclusion in a list of luminaries who, he said, should know better than to believe the corporate media claim that several million more people voted for proven failure over hope in the presidential election.
Due to one (more) untimely hard drive failure, I don't know if I replied to George Salzman's e-mail to me - cited in his open letter - or if I only planned to reply. If I did, I encouraged George to present convincingly as much good evidence as he could find of the possible fraud. I read his articles eagerly, looking for the evidence of massive, and so mostly electronic, vote fraud. In that open letter he finally presented some. I've found better on my own. Here it is.
- Posted by Nora Callahan - January 20, 2005 at 1:49 amA lot of people are very confused about the recent Supreme Court decision in US v Booker. As a "leader" of a group that advocates for Sixth Amendment rights (trial by jury) and an independent judiciary, in lieu of the "Modern Sentencing Reform System" that is under fire today, I feel obligated to lend a lay-voice to understanding these new developments.
In the mid-1980's, US lawmakers bent to the will of a get-tough-on-drugs crowd and gave birth to two kinds of sentencing schemes. They were given two different names. Names were very important when the 'modern reformists' began carving out new laws for the federal system.
- Posted by Bill Conroy - January 20, 2005 at 12:11 amU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is being called on the mat for racially profiling Hispanics and Haitians in South Florida, according to a recent report in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel.
ICE officials deny the allegations, but they are hard to dismiss out of hand, given the fact that Hispanic federal agents themselves have a class-action discrimination lawsuit pending against the agency. ICE is part of the Department of Homeland Security, which is the massive 200,000-employee bureaucracy created in the wake of 9/11 to safeguard the security of the nation.
The Sun-Sentinel reports the following:
"Many victims of the immigration sweeps have told us they were racially profiled," said Cheryl Little, director of the Miami-based Florida Immigration Advocacy Center. "They were stopped simply because of the way they looked or the language they spoke or because they had an accent."
- Posted by Ron Smith - January 19, 2005 at 6:45 pmCondoleeza Rice's hearing today contained a warning for our Venezuelan sisters and brothers that we cannot ignore.
La consejera de Seguridad Nacional de EEUU, Condoleeza Rice, durante una audencia en el Comité de Relaciones de Exteriores del Senado avisó a nuestra herman@s en La Republica Bolivariana que debemos pasar al alto.
I'll try to translate this myself in the next reply, just because I think it's important.
Voy a tratar a traducir este entrada abajo porque creo que puede ser importante a iniciar ese dialogo con nuestr@s herman@s al sur de la frontera.
- Posted by Don Henry Ford Jr. - January 19, 2005 at 2:46 pmThe drug trade is only one of many problems we now face in this world and is in itself a product of unfair business practices, both in the United States and in other countries of the world.
There are too many places where workers, if they can find a job at all, are forced to work for wages that will not provide an acceptable standard of living. And in each of these countries, others make unbelievably large amounts of money for their contributions to society.
- Posted by Al Giordano - January 19, 2005 at 9:38 amJim Schulz, in Cochabamba, recently started his "Blog From Bolivia" and has wasted no time showing how blogging is journalism (when it is done well) and how, conversely, good blogging demonstrates that what is called "journalism" at Commercial Media organizations that cover Latin America (and elsewhere) often is not journalism.
See Schulz's January 17 post, The U.S. Press, Bolivia, and Riots of the Imagination.
Specifically, Schulz shows how three U.S. "journalists" (and consequently one U.S. presidential candidate whose aids apparently read and believe the kind of trash that passes for journalism up there) completely rewrote the history of the fall of disgraced Bolivian president Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, filling the story with phobic myths from the recesses of their own imaginations.
On the blogger's chopping block: Jane Bussey of The Miami Herald, William F. Jasper of The New American and Jackson Diehl of The Washington Post...
- Posted by Franz J.T. Lee - January 18, 2005 at 8:42 pmThe historic life and heroic struggle of Mahatma K. Gandhi (Oct 2, 1869 to Jan 30, 1948) against British colonial injustice, human degradation, economic exploitation and social discrimination are well known, here we will just spotlight certain selected aspects of his social philosophy, its moral principles and its contemporary relevance for global revolutionary and emancipatory efforts.
- Posted by Don Henry Ford Jr. - January 15, 2005 at 11:40 am© 2004 Don Henry Ford Jr.
This was something I wrote and posted in my diary at the Agonist. Actually though, I did this for a Mexican photojournalist by the name of Julian Cardona to try to give people a glimpse at the hometown of George W. and how his background influences the foreign policy of our country. Drugs are just a small part of a much larger problem.
One of the most embarrassing things I have to do in this day and time is to admit that I share anything in common with George W. Bush. But I do.
I spend a lot of time issuing disclaimers about bushabout how hes really a cold-hearted blue-blood Yankee wrapped in a Texas hide. And about how no God-fearing Texan could possibly be that bad. While there is some truth to that, the fact remains that my compatriots overwhelmingly voted for him, and do share a lot of his views. I cant begin to describe how much it hurts to say thatto know that my homeland has produced such a man. And continues to support him despite the daily proof he offers to suggest he is an incompetent elitist with little or no compassion for those of different persuasion.
- Posted by Bill Conroy - January 14, 2005 at 8:15 pmThe U.S. Attorneys Office in Newark, N.J., recently announced that Jorge Reyeros was slated to be sentenced in April of this year for conspiring with his brother, Juan, and their Colombian contacts to smuggle 150 kilos of cocaine into the United States in 1999.
Jorge Reyeros also was convicted of accessing a U.S. Customs Service computer without authorization. He is facing a prison sentence for his crimes of up to 30 years, according to the U.S. Attorneys Office.
On the surface, there is nothing remarkable about Reyeros story. He appears to be just another number in the war on drugs. But according to former U.S. Customs inspector John B. Conroy, Reyeros indictment in 2000 for his crimes should have happened some four years earlier which is when Conroy first blew the whistle on his activities.
For Conroy, the Reyeros case is emblematic of how law enforcement itself has been corrupted by the war on drugs.
- Posted by Benjamin Melançon - January 14, 2005 at 10:48 amOn January 7 on TomPaine.com and reprinted January 10 on guerilla news network, Russ Baker reported that fraud did not change "the outcome of the most important presidential election in recent times." Baker's expansive definition of fraud includes even voter suppression. He wrote:
The [House Judiciary Democrats'] report concludes that the "massive and unprecedented" voting irregularities in Ohio were in many cases caused by "intentional misconduct and illegal behavior." Sounds like fraud to me.
Baker then runs through a handful of claims, but he does not draw these claims from the report cited above (available in .pdf format). Instead, he takes the claims from laywers suing to overturn the election, writing that the report takes much from the lawsuits.
Baker finds only one claim to be true, the misallocation of voting machines, and states that this was "probably not" intentional. He thus concludes in "Election 2004: Lost or Stolen" that it was lost.
As he wrote about those ambitious lawyers he hung out with, Baker has good intentions but he is wrong.
- Posted by Don Henry Ford Jr. - January 13, 2005 at 5:35 pmThe Supreme Court has taken a step in the right direction by giving judges more discretion at sentencing time. But we still have a long way to go. Unlike some, maybe most that read columns on this site, I am not in favor of total legalization of drugs. If I were, getting that done is an unattainable goal. It aint going to happen.
- Posted by Sean Donahue - January 13, 2005 at 2:11 pmNewsweek reports that the Pentagon is considering having U.S. Special Forces train death squads in Iraq, modeled on U.S. death squads in El Salvador.
What Newsweek fails to note is that:
- This policy represents standard U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine, employed around the world since the 1960's.
- Two suspicious kidnappings in Iraq last year suggest that death squad activity may already exist in Iraq.
- The "Salvador Option" is not an extreme option being considered by a few neo-cons at the Pentagon, rather it reflects a policy that could easily develop bipartisan support, and which John Kerry may have been hinting at during the presidential campaign.
- The leak of the "Salvador Option" may be a conscious attempt to test the waters regarding public sentiment about Iraqi death squads and to pad the impact of later revelations about U.S. actions in Iraq.
- Posted by Bill Conroy - January 12, 2005 at 7:50 pmNarco News reported earlier this year that The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) -- the government monolith created in the wake of 9/11 -- had adopted a draconian secrecy classification scheme for any information it deems sensitive.
In a directive issued in May 2004, DHS created a new For Official Use Only (FOUO) classification process covering a wide range of information that the government bureaucracy deems sensitive but unclassified.
The directive required DHS employees and private contractors to sign non-disclosure agreements prior to being given access to FOUO information.
However, Secrecy News, an e-mail bulletin put out by the Federation of American Scientists' Project on Government Secrecy, reports that DHS has now eliminated the non-disclosure agreement mandate for DHS employees.
- Posted by John F. Eden - January 12, 2005 at 6:58 pmThe latest Pentagon strategy under consideration, according to Newsweek, for the Iraq debacle has the hairs on the back of my neck rising. They intend to re-create the Salvadoran death squads using Kurdish and Shiite militia to pursue a more "aggressive" approach to quelling the so-called insurgents.
[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6802629/site/newsweek] [Newsweek article on MSNBC]
- Posted by Al Giordano - January 12, 2005 at 10:42 amYesterday's daily Folha de São Paulo (registration required), Brazil's largest newspaper, reports that a recent policy enacted by the Brazilian government to shoot down suspected drug smuggling airplanes has simply caused narco-smugglers to change their routes from the air to the land.
It's the classic drug-war story of "the golf ball under the rug." You can swat down that bump in the carpet in one place, only to find that it will pop up somewhere else.
And so it is with the failed policy of "interdiction" of drug shipments, as the Folha article explains...
- Posted by Gissel Gonzales - January 12, 2005 at 10:41 amEn un mensaje presidencial a la nación el presidente Carlos Mesa advierte a la población boliviana que renunciara si no le dejan gobernar, no está dispuesto a ejercer violencia y a actuar como su antecesor Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada en vista de las movilizaciones que se presentan en contra del alza de los carburantes y en busca de una nueva Ley de Hidrocarburos que recupere la propiedad de los hidrocarburos para los bolivianos.
Mesa asegura estar respaldado por el 90% de la gente que respondió afirmativamente a las preguntas del Referéndum vinculante del gas, mientras que otras fuerzas políticas, que tienen entre el 5 y 7% de respaldo popular, hoy están interesadas en colocar un “candado” a su administración gubernamental.
- Posted by Benjamin Melançon - January 10, 2005 at 3:52 pm"For that night, that moment, this country was someplace I was proud to call home," writes library worker Vivien Lorelied in her account of the determined voters at the Shepard Branch Library in Columbus, Ohio one of the precincts severely shortchanged of voting machines because Republican officials could predict the community's commitment to save the country from George W. Bush.
Here is Lorelied's complete account, of people who show why democracy is worth fighting for:
- Posted by Franz J.T. Lee - January 10, 2005 at 10:39 amWhile the Venezuelan ship of state, for a while, still encounters itself in the revolutionary doldrums, let us look at our black, golden future.
Sometime ago, Alfredo Bremont wrote a most interesting commentary: "The US shooting Venezuelan (Russian built) MIGs could be really dangerous".
He summed up the current politico-economic global context of the Venezuelan Bolivarian Revolution as follows:
"In this decade black gold has displaced the yellow one ... it is no longer how many billions of gold bars that a nation has in his national bank reserves that signify anything, but rather how many billions of petrol reserves you have. ... The Venezuelan bolivar should break away from parity with the US dollar and create its own measure ... Venezuelan oil reserves are valued more than gold bullion in a bank."
- Posted by Benjamin Melançon - January 9, 2005 at 3:42 pmThree days ago the most powerful governments in the world confirmed their support of dictatorship over democracy in Haiti. On January 6 the World Bank Group approved $73 million in loans and grants for the illegitimate and discredited government of the suffering nation, with the bulk of it to be distributed immediately.
The money given previously has not consolidated the violent rule of this government.