The questions about Evo Morales' (ability to have) independence from U.S. empire, raised in the
original article and comment thread about U.S. State Department aid continuing to Bolivia started by Stephen Peacock's breaking news, has been partially answered.
From the New York Times, via The NewStandard:
New York Times: Less than a month after President Evo Morales took office in Bolivia, the Bush administration is planning to cut military aid to the country almost completely. The amount of money Bolivia normally receives is small; much of it is used to train Bolivian military officers in the United States. But the cut holds the potential to anger Bolivia's powerful military establishment, which has been responsible for a long history of coups. Morales has been openly hostile to US geopolitical interests in South America.
I've started a new thread because the NarcoSphere has been so active, the original post, "U.S. State Dept. Steps Up Support of Bolivian Counterdrug Ops, Despite Morales' Rise to Power", is off the front page! It also apparently didn't get the attention it merited at the time. The question remains: is the coca-crop elimination money (not, in truth, counter-drug) still considered a significant lever of control by the U.S. government, or just a bureaucratic holdover?
Still in Proposal Stage
Submitted February 10, 2006 - 8:14 am by Stephen PeacockRegarding the word "counterdrug" vs. the phrase "coca-crop elimination," could it be just a matter of semantics or specificity rather than inaccuracy to use one over the other?
Regardless, I'll keep my eyes open to see if the State Dept. cancels -- or awards a contract for -- the Trucks for Bolivia procurement.