Language

Benjamin Melançon's Reporter's Notebook

 

UK 2-year Study calls for Harm Reduction, Not Demonization

The Royal Society commission on drugs declared "The use of illegal drugs is by no means always harmful any more than alcohol use is always harmful."

The Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, or RSA, commission on illegal drugs judged that together with alcohol and tobacco other drugs should be dealt with in public policy as a "matter of health, not just crime."

A Press Association report carried by the Guardian, pulled out these excerpts from the report released March 9:

"The evidence suggests that a majority of people who use drugs are able to use them without harming themselves or others. They are able, in that sense, to 'manage' their drug use ... The harmless use of illegal drugs is thus possible, indeed common," it said.

(The report's statement of the obvious is likely to be controversial, the Guardian wrote.)

"Drugs policy should, like our policy on alcohol and tobacco, seek to regulate use and prevent harm rather than to prohibit use altogether," the report concludes.

Comments

Point of Curiosity

I'm curious what people think about the morality of drug use.  

Is it a moral issue, or simply a matter of legal policy, potentially faux-moral for political expediency?

Morality of Drug Use

I am in favor of harm reduction; the morality, or lack thereof, of drug use is simply a red herring. As an old-fashioned American, I believe that we should be free to ingest, smoke, read, say or look at anything we want, without the slightest interference from government. The puritans among us will of course bring in the children as their big guns. Whether children should drink or smoke should be up to their parents, not the state.
The so-called drug war, in Latin America and in our inner cities, is simply a convenient method for control of the "lower classes," and is completely political in nature.

The morality is in the application, not the tool

Drugs are technologies for changing consciousness.

For me the moral and ethical questions revolve around the ways in which people use those technologies, the reasons they choose them, and the intentions they hold while using them.

The technologies themselves are, for the most part neutral.  The circumstances and consequences of their use determine the morality of their use.

Add comment

Our Policy on Comment Submissions: Co-publishers of Narco News (which includes The Narcosphere and The Field) may post comments without moderation. All co-publishers comment under their real name, have contributed resources or volunteer labor to this project, have filled out this application and agreed to some simple guidelines about commenting.

Narco News has recently opened its comments section for submissions to moderated comments (that’s this box, here) by everybody else. More than 95 percent of all submitted comments are typically approved, because they are on-topic, coherent, don’t spread false claims or rumors, don’t gratuitously insult other commenters, and don’t engage in commerce, spam or otherwise hijack the thread. Narco News reserves the right to reject any comment for any reason, so, especially if you choose to comment anonymously, the burden is on you to make your comment interesting and relevant. That said, as you can see, hundreds of comments are approved each week here. Good luck in your comment submission!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

User login

Reporters' Notebooks