Language

Reporter's Notebook: Bill Conroy

FOIA documents in House of Death case now online at Narco News

DEA supervisor Sandalio Gonzalez fired off a letter in February 2005 to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials in El Paso, Texas, that blew the whistle on an alleged cover-up within the U.S. justice system.

The letter exposed federal agents’ complicity in multiple murders in the Mexican border town of Ciudad Juárez. The homicides were tied to an investigation into Heriberto Santillan-Tabares, who U.S. prosecutors claim is a top lieutenant in Vicente Carrillo Fuentes’ Juárez drug organization.

Santillan has been charged with cocaine and marijuana smuggling along with five counts of murder. His case is currently pending in federal district court in San Antonio, Texas, and is slated for trial in May. A confidential informant, who allegedly had attained high standing within the Juárez organization, played a critical role in snaring Santillan. The informant’s name is Jesus Contreras, who is also known by the nickname “Lalo.”

Between August 2003 and mid-January 2004, a dozen people were tortured, murdered and then buried in the yard of a house in the Mexican border town of Ciudad Juárez. Contreras, according to sources, participated in many of those murders.

The informant’s handlers, agents and supervisors with the El Paso office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), were allegedly fully aware of the Contreras’ complicity in the murders. However, they did nothing to stop the killing for fear of jeopardizing the Santillan case and a separate cigarette-smuggling case that they were trying to make with the informant’s help.

The Santillan case falls under the jurisdiction of U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton, who is considered to be “wired” into the current Bush administration. Sutton, a former policy coordinator for the Bush-Cheney Transition Team, served as the Criminal Justice Policy Director from 1995-2000 for then-Governor George W. Bush.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Juanita Fielden -- who is the lead prosecutor on the Santillan case -- also worked closely with the ICE supervisors and agents who handled the informant at the center of both the Santillan and the cigarette-smuggling cases.

Gonzalez is now claiming that DEA brass retaliated against him because his letter ruffled the feathers of Sutton, a big-shot U.S. Attorney in San Antonio.

The letter represents evidence that the government screwed up, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office didn’t want that letter being thrown in their faces during a trial, law enforcement sources contend. As a result, Gonzalez was told to shut up, his work record tarnished in retaliation and the letter buried -- until now.

Following are links to the actual Freedom of Information Act documents that have brought this whole matter out of the shadows and into the light of day for everyone to see.

The FOIA documents


Gonzalez' Feb. 24, 2004, letter to ICE and the U.S. Attorney’s Office


Gonzalez’ June 30, 2004, letter to the U.S. Department of Justice’s Inspector General, and the IG’s response.


Gonzalez’ Sept. 9, 2004, complaint to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel


The OSC’s responses to Gonzalez’ complaint


Gonzalez’ Feb. 15, 2005, complaint to the Merit Systems Protection Board, which is still pending


Other records

Gonzalez’ May 2, 2003, DEA performance appraisal record


Gonzalez’ Aug. 20, 2004, DEA performance appraisal record


Gonzalez’ Aug. 27, 2004, request for a review of his DEA performance rating

Comments

500 Claims of Retaliation Ignored

William Fisher for IPS reports there's been something of an epidemic of punishing whistleblowers in the U.S. federal government.

Add comment

Our Policy on Comment Submissions: Co-publishers of Narco News (which includes The Narcosphere and The Field) may post comments without moderation. All co-publishers comment under their real name, have contributed resources or volunteer labor to this project, have filled out this application and agreed to some simple guidelines about commenting.

Narco News has recently opened its comments section for submissions to moderated comments (that’s this box, here) by everybody else. More than 95 percent of all submitted comments are typically approved, because they are on-topic, coherent, don’t spread false claims or rumors, don’t gratuitously insult other commenters, and don’t engage in commerce, spam or otherwise hijack the thread. Narco News reserves the right to reject any comment for any reason, so, especially if you choose to comment anonymously, the burden is on you to make your comment interesting and relevant. That said, as you can see, hundreds of comments are approved each week here. Good luck in your comment submission!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

User login

Reporters' Notebooks