Something about this has a familiar ring to it. The Council on Hemispheric Affairs an influential liberal Washington think-tank has retracted another article from its website after the pieces jaw-dropping conclusions unleashed what senior editor Larry Birns calls an intense dispute on the part of outside critics. Our readers will remember that, on September 14, 2007, COHA published an article by research associate Michael Glenwick, titled Préval of HaitiA Provisional Report Card: Grade B+. In addition to some tortured punctuation in the articles title, Glenwick made a number of statements that were surprising, to say the least, to anyone following the news from Haiti since a rightwing paramilitary uprising overthrew democratically-elected president Jean-Bertrand Aristide.
One week later, Narco News contributor (and contributor to the online publication HaitiAnalysis) Joe Emersberger wrote in these pages:
There can be no serious dispute about the scale of the bloodbath under Gerard Latortues coup installed government one that was backed (quite predictably) by the US, Canada, France and the UN Security Council. Less predictable, and in some ways more important, was the backing Lortortue received from progressive and independent institutions. Glenwicks article moves COHA decisively into the camp of NGOs and media outlets that have served Haitis neo-Duvalierists so effectively in recent years. This represents a significant loss. Shortly before and after the coup, COHA stood admirably apart from the corporate media herd in its analysis of events in Haiti.