Language

Dan's Blog

 

Gringo Anti-Drug Forces in Colombia Moonlight as Narcos

U.S. forces have figured out a new way to get all that offensive cocaine out of Colombia: smuggle it out, and, while they’re at it, sell it back in the States.

According to several reports filed this weekend, five of the hundreds of U.S. troops stationed in the country as part of “Plan Colombia” have been arrested for using a military aircraft to transport the sixteen kilos of cocaine they were caught with to the U.S. via the military base in El Paso, Texas where they landed. Details are still quite sketchy, but the basic facts of the case speak for themselves. Colombian president and Bush administration favorite Alvaro Uribe said in a press conference that the suspects were “members of the American military detachment that provides us training and contributes in many areas,” and that “it would not be surprising if there were more people involved, Americans and potentially Colombians as well.”

The 800-odd military force that the U.S. maintains in Colombia (along with the 600 private mercenaries – a number that seems sure to rise – who do the dirty work) is in many ways a symbol on display for both the Colombian and American people of a narrative that justifies U.S. military support for a government with one of the worst human rights records in the hemisphere.

Cocaine, you see, is one of the biggest threats to the United States (“America,” as Uribe calls it publicly, while Simón Bolivar spins in his grave), and the Colombian military is simply too vulnerable to the corruptive influence of all that expensive cocaine just at arm’s reach, and needs the incorruptible presence of U.S. boys there to set a good example.

This is a narrative the U.S. media plays an active role in maintaining. The two breakthrough movies on the drug trade in recent years, Traffic and Maria Full of Grace, both by gringo directors, portrayed sympathetic U.S. enforcement officers helpless against the overwhelming corruption of Latin American officials and people in general. Such fantasies, of course, along with the press reports that mirror them, ignore both the proven ineffectiveness of drug prohibition and how such policies are used as political cover for other political and military interests across Latin America.

Associated Press reports:

“It was the second major scandal to hit the U.S. military in Colombia.

“In 1999, the wife of former commander of U.S. anti-drug operations in Colombia, Laurie Heitt, pleaded guilty of shipping $700,000 in cocaine and heroin to New York in diplomatic parcels. She was sentenced to five years in prison.”

$700,000 is, coincidentally enough, pretty close to the current street value of 16 kilos of heroin. It will be interesting to see what kind of sentence these soldiers end up with. Suspected Colombian drug traffickers are often denied a trial in their own country and extradited to the U.S. – a process that, as the number of extradited approaches 300, an increasing number of Colombians are seeing as an insult to their national sovereignty. The U.S. soldiers were immediately extradited as well – to their own country, the United States – although they had been caught on Colombian soil. Prensa Latina, the Cuban news agency, quotes Uribe as saying, in response to questions on this issue:

“The majority of the North American workers have diplomatic passports, so this (their immediate extradition) shouldn’t strike us as odd.”

But it may be harder than Uribe thinks to convince his own people that there is nothing odd about the U.S. assistance program in general, when the soldiers his patrons in the Bush administration send turn out to be hardly better than the narcos they are supposedly sent to fight.

Comments

More on Drug Trafficking U.S. Soldiers

A Narco News reader writes, in response to this story,
“She only got 5 years for sending 700,000 worth of coke? I got 3 1/2 to 9 for possession of less than an ounce!”

El Tiempo, Colombia’s leading daily newspaper, has some similar questions in today’s editorial regarding the leniency shown towards http://www.narconews.com/nmonth0400.html ">the Hiett family compared to criminals of less elite pedigree:
The national experience with U.S. officials who have succumbed tot he temptation of narco-trafficking is hardly encouraging reassuring. In 1999, the wife of Colonel James Hiett, member of the U.S. embassy in Bogotá, was accused of sending drugs in diplomatic parcels with the knowledge of her husband and help from her Colombian driver. Mrs. Hiett and her spouse were judged in the United States. She received a sentence of five years in prison, and Colonel Hiett five months plus a few more under house arrest. As for the driver, he was left in the hands of the Colombian justice system, which gave him eight years in prison. This means that the U.S. citizen who was the true author of the crime is now free, that her soldier husband received a benevolent punishment from any viewpoint, and that the native chauffeur who had a marginal role is still or should still be a prisoner.”
 
So, will these “narcosoldiers,” as the Colombian press is now calling them, receive a lenient sentence a la Hiett, or a harsher one like their Colombian driver? I have a feeling their punishment will tend towards the harsher side… the U.S. has some serious damage control to do in Colombia, and most likely these soldiers are just lower-level grunts with little political capital, the ones who always pay the price for the adventures of their politician bosses. To me this makes them much more sympathetic than the Hietts, who were living a nice, comfortable life in Bogotá, complete with their own “native driver.” U.S. soldiers in Colombia, meanwhile, are stuck out in the jungle or the mountains earning notoriously un-generous combat pay, watching their countrymen employed as private contractors in Colombia (with more and more arriving to take on the army’s dirty work) earning six-figure salaries. That cocaine they tried to smuggle back probably just about makes up the difference.

Of course, as El Tiempo points out elsewhere in today’s editorial, we don’t really know who these guys are, which is also troubling. Here is a translation of another key paragraph:

“Was it permitted that the uniformed traffickers leave to be arrested in their country of origin and tried by the institution that they belong to? If that is so, are there legal norms that authorize this? What will happen to the accomplices that are eventually discovered in Colombia? Will the U.S. citizens be sent to Texas in an Air Force plain, while the Colombians are judged in their own country (unless, of course, Washington requests their extradition)? Does Colombia lack the authority to apprehend and process foreign troops that commit crimes on its own soil? What exactly were these five people doing in our country, what kind of instruction against narco-trafficking could they impart, and to whom? And, finally, who are they and what rank to these military traffickers have? If they exhibit the extradited Colombians before all the media before and after taking them, why don’t they divulge the identity of the men in custody?

jails and prisons

One of the intersting things I discovered when I went to prison was this: regardless of the level of security--and most of the places I saw were surrounded with guard towers and armed guards, double razor-wire fences with motion detectors, etc.--all of them had dope inside. In some it was cheaper than on the streets, due to the connections many inside had.

So if you can't keep it out of these places, how do you think you'll keep it out of the country?

Add comment

Our Policy on Comment Submissions: Co-publishers of Narco News (which includes The Narcosphere and The Field) may post comments without moderation. All co-publishers comment under their real name, have contributed resources or volunteer labor to this project, have filled out this application and agreed to some simple guidelines about commenting.

Narco News has recently opened its comments section for submissions to moderated comments (that’s this box, here) by everybody else. More than 95 percent of all submitted comments are typically approved, because they are on-topic, coherent, don’t spread false claims or rumors, don’t gratuitously insult other commenters, and don’t engage in commerce, spam or otherwise hijack the thread. Narco News reserves the right to reject any comment for any reason, so, especially if you choose to comment anonymously, the burden is on you to make your comment interesting and relevant. That said, as you can see, hundreds of comments are approved each week here. Good luck in your comment submission!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

User login

Reporters' Notebooks