[EL CAJON, Calif., 2/18/10 8:35am p.s.t., by: Dennes Demennes for the Narcosphere; updated on 2/19/10 11:24am p.s.t.] Criminal activity is directly subservient to Police one, by creating the necessary elements that will then necessitate that they themselves (the police) exist, therefore it’s like both feed off each other (crime and police). One (crime) is created by the second (the police), so that it too will be formed as a byproduct to clean it up, as it were. It’s like a chicken-vs-egg question.
‘How is crime created?’ you may ask. Answer: Silly laws like speeding limits—designed to cause you to crash by creating an annoyance by simply observing the speed limit, but only no body else wants to follow the speed limit, only you. So you end up looking like a retard, and probably will get a ticket for obstructing the flow, for simply obeying the law. Doesn’t seem fair, but whatever, I guess. Life wasn’t meant to be fair.
The speeding law is just one example of a law designed to create an atmosphere of frustration amongst drivers all requiring the need of police intervention at some point. Since people will be acting like animals due to the slow (is a person really slow for obeying the law? It’s never really explained how that works…) driving and anything is likely to happen when nerves get tense, and people are trying to arrive at their destinations. Not one person obeys the speed limit. It’s a joke of a law, really.
So then ask yourself. All the people speeding, whom are they ultimately all working for? Answer: The Police. Because it’s going to make you want to speed just like them, but you will eventually most likely get ticketed. Was it worth the price? Obviously, no amount of trying to make logical sense of the road and manage laws and actual traffic simultaneously is worth the cost of a traffic violation. It’s almost better just to not drive at all, frankly.
‘How are the criminals benefitting?’ you may also be asking. Answer: They’re getting a rush from breaking ‘the law’ and being ‘rebels’ knowing they can only get away with it 99% of the time, but that 1% the police will eventually arrive at catching each individual speeder, each in their turn, just by the random chance element involved—and the speeders figure it’s a small price to pay for feeling like they’re in NASCAR. The cops also get a rush from the act of chasing the ‘random’ speeders and they’re willing to pay the price in being the stooges in the big financial scheme the government has going for itself, and don’t mind getting disrespected 99% of the time by criminals getting away with ‘crime’ (which really shouldn’t have been called crime in the first place) right in front of their faces.
When one puts silly limits on situations not requiring any intervention, then one also obstructs the natural flow of things—which would have moved in harmony on their own. The western mindset is always to disturb the balance of nature in any way possible. ‘If there’s a passing lane, it means I have to pass, even if I’m speeding while doing so’, says the average schmuck on the road, because it creates a disturbance and a disturbance is good for business. The more chaotic the circumstances, the merrier for all involved.
Got a 9-11? That was like winning the lottery, right? (eg: for the neocons and for the islamists—both becoming equally important players in a global conflict over which religion will dominate mankind). ‘It’s the day the New World Order was founded!’, appears to be their implied message when their media representatives talk about pre-911 vs post-911 world or mentality or what have you. Just listen to someone like Chris Matthews for an example of this.
In in Ideal world, people should self-regulate and check and balance each other, so that in reality police shouldn’t even exist. Police make a bad situation worse. They don’t prevent crime, they nurture it. They indeed create crime in the first place—crime that would not have existed had it not been for their silly rules and limits that make no sense…except insofar that it can be seen as an act of self-preservation (eg: the act of creating silly rules by the police), so it has some (although very limited) worth, in that regard.
Email this page