THE DEMOCRATIC PROZAC OF, BY AND FOR THE PEOPLE
Visiting Feuerbach and Marx again in the Epoch of Global Fascism
By Franz J. T. Lee
Ché Guevara underlined that the duty of all real, true revolutionaries, "is to make the revolution", to act (práxis) and to think (theory) it. In time, this implies also to warn the comrades about mortal ideological dangers, no matter how delicate they may be, even touching "forbidden fruits" and "sacred cows".
The bourgeois, capitalist, democratic thinkers of the Enlightenment, were experts in liberating themselves from obsolete beliefs, from obscurantist scholasticism, bigotry and obscure, Roman, Catholic, absolutist, feudalist nightmares, they knew how at first to get fundamental things very straight, and then to storm the Bastille: they separated the medieval Church from the absolutist State, replaced the burning stake with the guillotine, detonated the dogmatic religious ideology of the feudalist State by the Grace of God, and launched their heliocentric rational world outlook. Only as such bourgeois Reason and Capital could triumph, could the French and Industrial Revolutions realize, materialize themselves, could Western Democracy defend itself, could it become invincible.
Similarly, it became necessary for the Hegelian Left, the radical democrats, among them, Feuerbach, Marx and Engels, also to get things straight with religion, with ideology, with the famous Faustian "Gretchenfrage", before they could present the Communist Manifesto to the world proletariat, a conditio sine qua non to develop their own revolutionary práxis and theory, as Negation within the Global System.
Let us pay Feuerbach and Marx once more a short cordial visit, to see the quintessence of the warning of Heinz Dieterich concerning the Roman Catholic oligarchs in Venezuela, to see what is the fundamental problem of the current Bolivarian Revolution, at a decisive stage of its historic development in Venezuela, Latin America, and the rest of the exploited, oppressed world.
Surely, the Conquista with its ruling class religion had introduced Roman Catholicism into Latin America, not to convert "savages" into "Children of God", but for the sake of colonial rapine, rampage and pillage. It was used as "opium" for the "natives" to make them docile and pacific, to make their horrible, terrible colonial existence tolerable. European monotheistic, patriarchal, absolutist religion was converted into "the sigh of the oppressed creature", into"the heart of a heartless world", into "the soul of soulless conditions" (Marx).
As we ought to know, two European thinkers have analysed the very quintessence of Christianity and modern Western, monotheistic religions. To understand historically the global religious impact in ideology, mind and thought control, very briefly, I will summarize the main ideas of Feuerbach and Marx.
The 19th-century German philosopher and moralist, Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach, was born on July 28, 1804, in Landshut, Bavaria, now a Province of Germany. He died on September 13, 1872 in Rechenberg, Germany. He was the fourth son of the famous jurist Paul von Feuerbach. His father forced him to study Theology, but soon he abandoned this career, and in Berlin became a student of Philosophy under the guidance of the famous German philosopher Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel. He studied Natural Science, and he showed great interest in topics like death and immortality. In 1828, he began to study natural science at the University of Erlangen, and two years later, he anonymously published his first book, Gedanken über Tod und Unsterblichkeit (Thoughts on Death and Immortality). He attacked the idea of personal immortality, explaining, that after death, all individual human qualities are being reabsorbed into the Cosmos, into Nature. This means that already very early in his life, Feuerbach was an atheist, a materialist, attacking religious Mind Control.
In fact, already before 1840, he wrote:
that Christianity has in fact long
vanished not only from the reason
but from the life of mankind, that
it is nothing more than a fixed idea.
This idea was developed in his work, Über Philosophie und Christentum (1839; On Philosophy and Christianity). But already in his Abälard und Heloise (1834) and Pierre Bayle (1838), he was introducing these themes. This critique of Religion was epitomized in his titanic work: Das Wesen des Christentums (1841; The Essence of Christianity). In this work, he formulated the theory, that man is to himself his own object of thought, and that Religion is nothing more than a consciousness of the Infinite. His starting point was to analyse the true or anthropological essence of religion. As anthropological essence, he portrayed God as a being of understanding, as a moral being or law, in nuce, as love. Its as simple as all that, God Is Love! But the true consequence of this view is the idea that God is merely the extensive self-projection of mans intensive nature. In other words, Man, Big Brother, the Illuminati, is the creator of God, and not vice versa. Religion is a fantastic mental invention of Man The Ruler; of course, these innovations include a free trial of Heaven, Hell and Purgatory, and some shareware, i.e., its myriad of souls, spirits, angels, saints and popes.
We need not study medieval life, in order to note how these were utilized to control the minds of the impoverished serfs and peasants. Until today, globally, these sickening spectres spook around in our minds. They keep us in good spirit, they keep our spirit high. As bourgeois liberation, Feuerbach suggested that Man should reappropriate his essence, which he had ripped from himself by hypostatizing it in the fantastic religious idea of God. This explanation of religion is so obvious, yet billions just cannot grasp its emancipatory essence; they prefer to clothe their dear souls in foggy, smogy array.
Abandoning Hegelianism and attacking religious orthodoxy, Feuerbach stated expressis verbis, that the God of Christianity is an Illusion! Of course, Marx criticized this strange materialism in his famous Thesen über Feuerbach (written 1845/46). Besides, Feuerbach published other works, like Theogonie (1857) and Gottheit, Freiheit, und Unsterblichkeit (1866; God, Freedom, and Immortality).
What then did Feuerbach consider consciousness to be? This question is extremely important for education, for conscientization, for emancipation -- for class consciousness, for historic consciousness, for revolutionary práxis and theory. For Feuerbach, which are the basic elements of Consciousness, that either could generate Mind Control, or resist it? Well, the answer is a full dose of orgonic, erotic tranquillizers: Reason, Will and Love. What a remarkable Trinity! A Mighty One! Concentration, Centralization, Globalization. For sure, such an Emancipatory Trinity could blow the Illuminati off the Information Highway, out of the Milky Way.
However, the Encyclopaedia Britannica gives us the following summary of the essence of this philosophic issue:
Feuerbach interpreted the Christian mysteries as symbols of the alienation of human properties absolutized as divine attributes, and he criticized the contradictions of theology that are found in such concepts as God, the Trinity, the sacraments, and faith. Mans reappropriation of his essence from such religious alienation is consummated in the new religion of humanity, of which the supreme principle is that man is God to man.
However, as we can witness now already, in globalization, in the ideology of US global fascism, there is in the making a new religion, "mind and thought control", that affirms new crusades, new wars, new religious symbols and other holy mysteries. The Holy Father, the Pope, knows when to bless the invasion of Iraq, and under which conditions, also how and when to receive a Christian global murderer like Bush. This is not impiety, not blasphemy, it is simply stark reality in our epoch.
Feuerbach proposed that God was the extension of human aspirations. Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud and others held similar views. For Christians, God is Sustainer, Creator and Judge! Of course, many thinkers and writers protested against these justifications of God. Literature, drama and plays are full of examples in which writers, although influenced by Christian culture, attack such justifications. A classical example can be found in the Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoyevskys treatment of the misery of children in The Brothers Karamazov.
Now concerning prayer, an important instrument of religious mind and thought control, which was and still is being practised across the globe, the very Feuerbach remarked:
The most intimate essence of religion is revealed by the most simple religious act: prayer.
In evolutionary terms, in temporal-spatial parameters, historically, prayer appears to be neither universally progressive nor progressively regressive. Whether mystical, ceremonial or personal, always prayer expresses the individual or collective experience of the unknown, of cosmic mystery, that inspires or threatens the dependent, defenceless creature, it corners him/her, but also surpasses his/her imagination; however, by means of prayer, (s)he tries to seek and to establish a dialogue with the transcendental or supernatural. These sacred, authentic, original sentiments, feelings and emotions of the peoples of the so-called "Third World", of Latin America, of Venezuela, that President Chávez so eloquently expresses in his information "cadenas", were used and abused, were violated by European colonial conquest, avarice, megalomania and brutality, by means of Christian conversion, education and dissocialization, they were canalized into the epicenter of a real "mental holocaust", for which nobody claims reparation.
Their inherent loving, emancipatory humanity was progressively destroyed across the centuries, and knowledge, thinking and thought were converted into ruling class revelations and beliefs.
Within capitalist production, workers' sentiments, emotions and feelings were converted into Christmas gifts, became thing-relations, consumer products, became strychnine for revolutionary práxis and theory. Here in Venezuela, from this platform the current info war, the disinformation campaigns of Bush and his "opposition" lackeys are being launched; from this trampoline, the four "stormtroopers of the apocalypse" are launching their vicious attacks against the Bolivarian Revolution. This is why Marx emphasized that all criticism must begin with religious critique.
In Orwellian "Newspeak" style, exactly the human thinking faculty, Mind and Thought Control, that is "Globospeak", is destroying, perverting it, deviating it towards economic consumption, social perversion and mental slavery. By rote, prayer inculcates Mind Control in the very soul. The young religious Marx had his first critical experience when he met Hegel in Berlin. At first, the Christian Marx felt Hegel as being sickening; in fact, he really became ill, and the reason, in a letter to his father, he gave as follows: from intense vexation at having to make an idol of a view I detested. In other words, Marx had a similar reaction, like any staunch Chritian will have, who reads this article for the first time, and still sees atheist demons everywhere.
Later, Marx began to study religious realities and functions and joined the Doctor Club of the Young Hegelians, who were moving towards atheism, and there he was converted into a Feuerbachian. Now again, let the Encyclopaedia Britannica tell us about Marxs critique of Hegel, aided by the philosophy of Feuerbach:
To Marxs mind, (Feuerbach) successfully criticized Hegel, an idealist who believed that matter or existence was inferior to and dependent upon mind or spirit, from the opposite, or materialist, standpoint, showing how the Absolute Spirit was a projection of the real man standing on the foundation of nature. Henceforth Marxs philosophical efforts were toward a combination of Hegels dialectic the idea that all things are in a continual process of change resulting from the conflicts between their contradictory aspects with Feuerbachs materialism, which placed material conditions above ideas.
What did Marx say about Religion?
Man makes religion, religion does not make man, religion is indeed mans self-consciousness and self-awareness as long as he has not found his feet in the universe. ... Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual pointd honneur, its enthusiasm, ... It is the fantastic realization of the human being inasmuch as the human being possesses no true reality. The struggle against religion is therefore indirectly a struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion. And now, here is Marxs precise definition of religion: Religious suffering is at the same time an expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.
Allow me, just to add: Its the democratic prozac of, by and for the people!
AFTER CENTURIES OF RELIGIOUS INDOCTRINATION, HOW LITTLE DO WE KNOW ABOUT THE REAL WORLD
Let us recollect some wise statements:
"Everything that comes into existence, merits to pass away. (Hegel)
Seek for thy noble father in the dust: Thou knowst tis common, all that live must die, Passing through nature to eternity. (The Queen) Ay, madam, it is common. (Hamlet)
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy. (Hamlet)
Unsere heutige Wissenschaft kratzt nur die Oberfläche der Wirklichkeit an. Was sich darunter befindet, wissen wir nicht. (Physiker Harald Lesch auf Space Night)
Our contemporary natural science just scratches the surface of reality. Of what is below, we do not have the foggiest idea. (Physicist Harald Lesch in Space Night)
In contrast, let us now look at real danger facing Venezuela, that a religious mind cannot fathom, cannot combat, that is, the electro-magnetic arms that the USA could use, should it intervene violently in Venezuela.
What we -- the general public -- get as the latest inventions and discoveries, even in schools and universities, are just the obsolete, rotten crumbs, the inutile saw-dust, falling from the warlords experiment table. There exists such a profound inculcation, an authoritarian, totalitarian trust not only in God and the $, but in everything that flows around in newspeak, in what we were taught to be serious mass communication media, scientific journals and philosophic reviews.
For example, since years, we informed about weatherwarfare, climatic warfare, about HAARP, but, who really bothers to inform her/himself about this all? Of 6 billion, who knows anything about this advanced war technology, how it is being applied, why, and what are the effects? Such projects do not only exist in Alaska, constructed by the US Army, but elsewhere in Arecibo, Dushanbe, Gorkcity, Tromso, Monchegorsk, Sura, and who knows where too! In the Berlin Airport Tempelhof, Schroeder and Joschka have their own private HAARP!
Who knows anything about ELF-Waves? How to defend oneself against them? Because their frequency lies under 100 Hz, that the brain also uses, all sorts of experiments are being made, to influence our very feelings, emotions and thoughts. Big Brother controls our very bodily organs, directs our health or sickness. These waves can produce the CFIDS Syndrome, tiredness, cancer, AIDS, etc. Concerning this, just read the scientific organ, Raum & Zeit (109/110). These waves can be applied from satellite, from hundreds of kilometres, can penetrate the earth and the oceans!
All these brain waves can be affected:
-Delta (1-3 Hz.) ... Deep Sleep, Coma.
-Theta (4-7 Hz.)... Hypnosis, Trance, Dream.
-Alpha (8-13 Hz.)... Prayers, Meditation, Relaxation.
-Beta (14-40 Hz)... Awakened Situation.
Who knows about Scalar-Waves, built into loud-speakers, into music, used to transmit thoughts, ideology, instructions for sleepers, for Manchurian Candidates, for Mkultra victims, to blow up Twin Towers, to be human bombs? And, we will all argue that this is genetic, biological, coming from the aggressive Darwinian apes!! What about our debates concerning Occult Physics, the ether, of which Bill Lyne made us aware, what about the Pentagon Aliens, the UFOs, flying in and out of Los Alamos? Not only Bill says this; its not his copyrighted private intellectual property hundreds of other internet data of all genres and calibres are available to corroborate his findings. For example, the astrophysicist Nikolay Kosyrev also discovered the ether, and claimed that it is composed of gravitons.
What about the high probability of space colonies on the Moon, Mars and elsewhere since decades, or more? On the other hand, how did the US astronauts escape the dangerous Van Allen Belt, around the Earth, in which the USA had detonated huge atomic bombs? What did Thomas Bearden tell us about the Energy Crisis, and did he not predict the New Wars? What about Wilhelm Reichs Orgone and Teslas New Energy? Who informs us about them? Instead we have to listen to the religious nonsense, encircling Ronnie´s corpse, or to marvel about what Bush and the Pope discussed secretly.
What do billions know about the above? What are the implications and complications in our everyday life? What threatens Venezuela after August 15, 2004? Surely, the "Devil", but he is real, sitting in a "White House".
Finally, some time ago, Raum & Zeit (116) published a sensational article, concerning the discovery of Scalar-Waves. Apart from the fact, that these waves verify our very own Trialogics, for example, our Triagory, Rest a n d Motion AND Relation (Bezug), in the experiment, using gravitational waves, voices were transmitted between Germany and Russia, even signal transmission between Germany and Australia. Of course, like in the famous discovery of Christopher Columbus, the Bushmen and rabbits must have done this all along.
How is this possible in the universal dimensional cosmic resonator? However, using the G-Element and Bioguard, Dr. Mueller made this miracle possible. Of course, surprise, surprise, using speeds higher than the velocity of light, which like Don Albert explained, could transmit prayers to God outside the Universe in 15 minutes, it was discovered that extraterrestrial beings, aliens were already using the scalar waves for their private transmissions. Like in the case of the Pentagon Aliens of Los Alamos, of the extraterrestrial "UFO's", the very Pentagon War-Mongers knew all this long ago, and surely they are using the scalar waves for their New Wars and Space Colonization, and who knows, for the "Colombia Plan" and a possible invasion of Venezuela.
Hence, comrades-in-arms, be well-prepared, in deed, word and victory!
Religion vs media-- and keeping reality in view
Submitted June 15, 2004 - 8:25 pm by Benjamin MelançonI don't want to underestimate the role of religion in helping make people either 'defer gratification' until after death or, as my brother's old friend David Mitchell wrote, "think they know the big dark of the multiverse. When you do, it's not hard to justify your actions in the name of your creed."
Yet I wonder if religion is the main obstacle we face in understanding the world and acting collectively to change it.
The great Bill Watterson has a comic in which Calvin asks Hobbes "It says here 'Religion is the opiate of the masses.' What do you think that means?" The next panel pictures a television, with the thought balloon: "It means Karl Marx hadn't seen anything yet."
I mean to say that "the media" is a more immediate enemy to truth than religion. I also want to add that both religion and media contain contradictions. Christianity in particular has always fascinated me (as an outsider, a Jew) in its central placement of a radical champion of the downtrodden-- and how this fact is ignored or explained away by establishment churches but still sometimes bursts forth to join the forces for social justice. Media technology, in turn, while presenting a powerful way for the powerful to put out their point of view and marginalize others, also presents the opportunity of helping with the critical task of communicating our understanding of the world, and our hopes and dreams and strategies for a more just society, among all 6 billion of us.
The contradictions in all that exist have to be used for all the advantage we can get.
In Venezuela several facts suggest to me that it is more crucial to attack and intellectually destroy or in practice transform the media than it is to do the same for religion. Venezuela has 24.2 million people and only 4.1 million televisions (and some 10 million radios), and its people are 96 percent "nominally Roman Catholic" (according to Phrasebase). The rich of course are extremely against Chavez and the Bolivarian revolution. The small middle class (more or less religious than the average, does anyone know?) is presumably the main consumers of demonstrated lies from the commercial media. Largely as a result of this (I believe), they have also become very anti-Chavez, despite the likelihood that many would benefit in the medium-term (5 to 10 years) from a successful move toward economic justice.
That's the first three-quarters of Lee's essay, which you can see I found very thought-provoking. The last quarter upset me considerably in its departure from what I think I know about the world.
I believe truth has an objective existence, and that we have a chance of getting near it. Certainly, some things can be proven, some disproven, and many other things are probable or improbable.
Much of the last part of Franz J. T. Lee's post, the part titled "After Centuries of Religious Indoctrination, How Little Do We Know About the Real World," falls into the categories of disprovable or improbable. Lee wants to bring to our attention the "real danger facing Venezuela, that a religious mind cannot fathom, cannot combat, that is, the electro-magnetic arms that the USA could use, should it intervene violently in Venezuela." I feel he is unfortunately trying to direct our attention toward imaginary threats, when there already is an electro-magnetic arm being used in Venezuela: the electronic media. This, therefore, is what we must combat first, with truth and national and international organizing to get the truth out and to act to overcome the forces behind the TV and and radio propaganda.
The electro-magnetic weapons Lee says the United States government currently has include "weatherwarfare," ELF-waves, and Scaler waves. As for the powers ascribed to the second, I'll believe electro-magnetic waves can cause cancer and perhaps tiredness, but certainly not AIDS, and I'd doubt they can target individuals from outer space. As for the first and third, it's no secret governments would like to control the weather and also people's thoughts, but weather systems and human beings are two of the most complex things on the planet and as such the hardest to control in the sense Lee is using. (Lee cites what he calls a scientific publication, which I don't happen to know, called "Raum & Zeit.")
I think I can outright disprove, from my laptop, Lee's assertion of "the high probability of space colonies on the Moon, Mars and elsewhere". A lot of people with way too much time on their hands have a strong interest in the space program. Indeed, they have their own unofficial guides for where to watch shuttles take off from and when the launches occur. How could a colony be built or populated without this independent community getting very, very excited about the activity, which they would not just expose but celebrate?
Lee closes: "Hence, comrades-in-arms, be well-prepared, in deed, word and victory!" yes, but not for non-existent mind-control waves or weatherwarfare or whatever threat space colonies would pose, but for what we know any strong movement for social justice will face: propaganda, repression, and violent subversion which we must make known, analyze, and most importantly organize to defeat and overcome.