Language

Reporter's Notebook: Marcel Miranda

Test of the Ring: No One Has Ever Passed It, Some Go Crazy, Some Just Cry

The Test of the Ring can assist you in smashing your brain-washing and to actualize the severe changes that dignity and honor call down upon our thinking, the clarity of our goals, the design processes of our strategies for change and the purpose and operations of the institutions that shape our lives and our deaths.
       
         The Test of the Ring:

How to Fight Killer Capitalism, Methods, Plans and How to Tap the Inspirations All Around Us

Aristotle’s Philosophy of Friendship

In the Nichomachean Ethics Aristotle presents friendship as a virtue or something that requires virtue (something we consider good). For our purposes  “ideal friendship”, “perfect friendship”, and “true friendship”, are  the same thing:  the highest degree of friendship. Aristotle explains that in perfect friendship we love because of the essential nature or value of good character. He calls this friendship “friendship of the good,” because it can only exist between those who are good and virtuous. Perfect friendship is more lasting than friendships of utility or pleasure because, although we receive utility and pleasure from this friendship, when utility and pleasure cease to exist, the friendship does not.  Aristotle contends that perfect friendship is the truest from of justice; true friendship is rare because justice is rare.  Perfect friendships tend to require time and familiarity as well.

THE TEST OF THE RING

I used to think that ideology mattered...

Well you will have to wait for the rest of that sentence, but here is where it came from...

I am a Revolutionist!

I believe that creating a better future for all things requires severe changes in our thinking, the clarity of our goals, the design processes of our strategies for change and the purpose and operations of the institutions that shape our lives and our deaths. Toward this end is presented the Test of the Ring.

I. Define the terms you use continuously as they arise. Define the context of your discussion (the world that your analysis exists in) and any tiny changes that arise as you process and move around the ring. Be alert to the time frame that is assumed in your analysis and predictions, and be prepared to defend timeframe assumptions at any point in the process. Definitions, context and time are not constant. They interact and evolve. So, we must be aware of any shifts in these items and when there might be enough change in any of them to affect our plans or our way of thinking.

TYPICAL TERMS TO DEFINE:

Power/Politics; Imperialism/Capitalism; Love/Priority; Green/Sustainable; Self Defense/ Terrorism; etc. / meaninglessness…

The Ring

A. Begin your journey of discovery by explaining your longterm goals (Vision) for your region and then for the world. Examine how the two might conflict or compliment.

B. Describe short objectives/goals and how they lead to the longterm goals. (Remember: definitions updates, timeframes, contexts).

C. Then explain how you achieve your short term objectives: Strategies, tactics, tools and any assumptions. Then examine whether any of this impacts or changes the long term goals of your region or the world.

D. Examine possible uncertainties by developing scenarios that might evolve in Part B or C. Consider what changes in strategy or tactics ( or assumptions) might be needed. What will be the response of your adversaries and challengers?

E. At this point you have either encountered problems (or you certainly will be challenged on many points) and now find your self back at point A pr B on the Ring; or if no significant problems arise then you have circled the Ring.

F. Now you must proceed again with more details and added criticism.

* Note: It is advised that you give yourself this test and then have a friend (or a critic of your views) give you the test.

** Test of the Ring to be Updated –Help us evolve it!

One update is:
to be thorough you should cycle various perspectives through your plan after you have made it around the ring once or twice. Try doing the test with emphasis on the perspective of Psychology/Social Psychology; environment; crime/criminal gangs; Death Squads; demographics; technology (good and bad); wisdom/traditions; chaos...

Another useful idea is to write down an outline of how you proces the ring and save it so that you can see how you/your perspective changes over time.

Ex. :

OUTLINE WEB LINKS:
LESSONS; CURICUULUM AND FURTHER READINGS

STAGE I.
Definitions, Contexts Defined, Roadblocks and Brainwashing Problems

I. DEFINITIONS.

A. Killer Capitalism (Modern Capitalism): 1. Markets, Politics and  International Structures; 2. Consciousness; 3. Morality

B. Power (politics): 1. The Real left; 2. The Holloway Thesis

C. Imperialism (Fascism): 1.

D. Democracy: 1. Liberal Democracy (Democratic Republics) ; 2. Classic Socialist; 3. Participatory Planning (Market and non-Market)

E. Strategic Thinking: 1.
F. The Real Left: 1. Participatory Socialism; 2.

II. CONTEXTS.

A. Strengths and Weaknesses of USA Empire: 1.
B. Agents of Change: 1.Strengths and Weaknesses of the Resistance; 2.
C. Other Views: 1.

III. Roadblocks, Bottlenecks and Brainwashing

A. Slogans: 1. Think Local Act Global; 2. Small is Beautiful; 3. Save the Earth; 4. The Ends are the Means; 5. Power corrupts; 6. Bikes/Food not Bombs; 7. Love not war; 8.

B. Blocked Thinking:
1. Goals Confused with Strategies; 2. Traditions, Family, Peer Pressure, Self Doubt
C. Fear and Loops of fears.

STAGE II.

Section I:
Context & Examples of Strategic Thinking

About Marcel Miranda

Biography
A frequent traveller in Mexico & Central America, I look for the barriers - real or imagined - that divide us and limit our effectiveness. My Spanish sucks but I've spoken bad Spanish so long that it works - I make fun of myself and make stupid jokes about gringos - they always laugh! 37 years old, 12 years of college, a diverse background and persistent questioning... The Andes are the only future we have.

Add comment

Our Policy on Comment Submissions: Co-publishers of Narco News (which includes The Narcosphere and The Field) may post comments without moderation. All co-publishers comment under their real name, have contributed resources or volunteer labor to this project, have filled out this application and agreed to some simple guidelines about commenting.

Narco News has recently opened its comments section for submissions to moderated comments (that’s this box, here) by everybody else. More than 95 percent of all submitted comments are typically approved, because they are on-topic, coherent, don’t spread false claims or rumors, don’t gratuitously insult other commenters, and don’t engage in commerce, spam or otherwise hijack the thread. Narco News reserves the right to reject any comment for any reason, so, especially if you choose to comment anonymously, the burden is on you to make your comment interesting and relevant. That said, as you can see, hundreds of comments are approved each week here. Good luck in your comment submission!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

User login

Reporters' Notebooks