Houston Janitors Win Strike
Why did it require such a battle (and all the publicity that goes with it) for the janitors to get what they deserved? One might hope that for moral, or even purely financial reasons, the strike could have been resolved before it began. However, as in our attack and occupation of Iraq, there is an aspect of machismo on the part of the oppressors to try to get away with inflicting as much damage as they can.
Police attacked workers doing non-violent civil disobedience. The individual officers were improvising a bit, but they were also clearly receiving orders from above. Somehow, their power structure told them: "The janitors don't seem to mind getting arrested, so step up the pressure. Make things more uncomfortable for them." This message trickled down from the building and business owners, and from people annoyed that traffic was blocked as they tried to drive home. Their annoyance translated into the police being granted wider scope to create suffering. I saw cops writing jay-walking tickets to an old woman who was trying to follow instructions. Prosecutors followed suit, trying to set bail for those committing civil disobedience at $888,888 instead of the usual $500 for that type of offense.
In addition to these hard forms of oppression, there are other forms that are internal and psychological. Those benefiting from the janitors' labor might seek ways to ignore or justify the oppression. Houstonians wrote angry letters to local papers or on local blogs, saying that blocking traffic should be punished with stiff sentences. Those confronted by the demonstrations used the term "illegal aliens" to justify treating people unfairly, without any knowledge of the actual immigration status of those they sought to write off. The irony here is that if you only pay someone $20 a day, you have created a job that is so difficult for any US resident that you create a market for "illegal" labor. Many Houstonians convinced themselves that the benefit they derive from workers who have been forced to work part-time is not morally problematic, but that somehow, non-violent civil disobedience is. Our system is set up so efficiently to silence its victims, that even when they find their voices, we have many ways to ignore them.
The janitors won their battle, though they still deserve much more than they got. The police, the prosecutors and many who witnessed their struggle acted horribly, but that is the luxury of their power or class privilege. The victors can celebrate for a moment, as they leave the streets and return to cleaning the toilets of the vanquished.






Comments