Language

Reporter's Notebook: Stephen Peacock

New DHS Project Seeks To Create Border Surveillance Airships

The Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) has launched a research & development initiative whose aim is to deploy unmanned aerial surveillance drones specifically for border security. The Untethered Lighter-Than-Air (LTA) Platform Concept Development Project, as DHS calls it, seeks to create and eventually launch an unspecified number of airships loaded with advanced sensor and communications technologies. The goal is to equip the U.S. with a “persistent border surveillance” capability. DHS late last month began soliciting industry assistance in developing a modified commercial-prototype LTA vehicle, according to documents located during a routine search of the FedBizOpps contracting database. The department initially will award a one-year fixed-price contract to a vendor that can build a prototype airship and perform a “proof-of-concept test flight.” The project’s official statement of work points out that the LTA technology platforms must be capable of providing surveillance from a minimum altitude of 18,000 feet. The deadline for contractors to submit letters of interest for the program is July 28.

About Stephen Peacock

Biography
I'm a former Washington, DC, journalist (1998-2003) who most recently worked for Communications Daily and Washington Internet Daily (WID), investigative newsletters that cover the telecommunications, broadcast and Internet industries. Following the 9/11 attacks, my news beat expanded beyond Capitol Hill telecom/TV/IT policy and began to include technology-policy coverage at the Pentagon and Dept. of Homeland Security. I've written over a thousand articles about government and industry affairs, and I'm pleased to say that I was the reporter who broke the story about the Total Information Awareness surveillance/data-collection initiative of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. I've written articles for publications including NACLA Report on the Americas, Drug Enforcement Report, Corrections Journal, SoJo Mail (Sojourners), and the Tampa Tribune. I've also written a memoir about my former career as a plainclothes security officer of the Helmsley Palace hotel in New York City, Hotel Dick: Harlots, Starlets, Thieves & Sleaze. I look forward to contributing to the fine work being done here at NarcoSphere.

Comments

Yet another DHS boondoggle?

You have to wonder about the Department of Homeland Security’s tendency to come charging in on a white elephant.

Take a look at some excerpts (below) from the transcript of a PBS Frontline special that aired in 1993. The news show zeroed in on a similar aerial surveillance system deployed by U.S. Customs, which is now part of DHS.

The 1993 Customs program, known as aerostat, was sold to the American public as the greatest thing since sliced bread. But it proved to be a “boondoggle,” due in large part to the weather and geography realities of the border.

I wonder if this PBS transcript will be reviewed before the big “contracts” are awarded for DHS’ drone-clone version of aerostat on the border?

What happened to the Drug War? (Frontline, originally aired Feb. 2, 1993)

Excerpts

…. U.S. Sen. DeCONCINI: The aerostat program, which is a great, big balloon filled with gases that keep it afloat at 10,000 to 12,000 or more feet above the earth with a radar system in it, but with no personnel in it-that radar system circles and reaches out 150 miles and detects anything that is moving. And I don't know of any other system that could do this.

…. CAROL HALLETT: Former Customers Commissioner: The aerostat balloons have been one of the greatest deterrents that has come along, in terms of a border net, and it's just part of the overall strategy of defending our borders, and a very successful strategy when you realize that the-for all intents and purposes, the air war has been won along the southern border.

…. NARRATOR: To bolster the aerostats, Customs operates a fleet of P3 radar planes which cost $30 million each. Like the aerostats, they are equipped with downward-looking radar to search for smugglers' aircraft. Another key element in Customs' surveillance and pursuit strategy is the $5.5 million Blackhawk helicopter.

BLACKHAWK PILOT: [subtitles] The concept of the radar fence is good, but in reality it hasn't proven effective, which is obvious by the problems with the aerostats, specifically in Texas, in that they're not up.

NARRATOR: Aerostats are vulnerable to weather-related damage. The three Texas aerostats have been plagued with problems. In Marfa, high winds tore an aerostat into four pieces in January, 1992. In Rio Grande City, strong winds snapped the tether of another. Repairs cost $1 million. In Eagle Pass, one broke free and crashed 40 miles away.

Sen. DeCONCINI: Oh, we've had a lot of problems with the aerostats, a lot of them. Number one, the problem with the aerostat is they can't fly in inclement weather, so they're down. They average between 70 and 72 percent time they're up.

Mr. ROSENBLOOM [with Frontline]: What if you were told they operated at 39 percent?

…. NARRATOR: FRONTLINE has obtained the official 1992 work logs. What the Senator is apparently not including in his figures is the down time of the aerostats because of weather-related accidents. When included, the average flying time isn't 70 percent, as the Senator claims. It's only 39.9 percent.

Jack Blum was a staff counsel for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, specializing in drug policy matters.

JACK BLUM: The aerostats are a tremendous boondoggle. As far as I'm concerned, they're a total waste of money on all sides and, in fact, almost laughable.

Mr. ROSENBLOOM: Why?

Mr. BLUM: First of all, the aerostats have to come down in a high wind. And if the smugglers wait long enough, the wind goes up, the aerostats come down and in they come.

NARRATOR: Smugglers can also profit from the camouflage of mountainous terrain. The Baboquivari range south of the Port Huachuca aerostat in Arizona is one example.

MR. [FRANK] AULT [former Customs adviser]: The cold, hard facts of life are that over 60 percent of what that aerostat can see at Fort Huachuca is masked by rocks. We were very good, technically, but we haven't invented a radar that can see through rocks.

NARRATOR: And this 1989 report by Congress's General Accounting Office describes another problem with the aerostats. The report found that when smugglers fly under 500 feet, aerostats "have difficulty distinguishing such aircraft ... from surface clutter," such as cars.

… NARRATOR: In 1989, NBC News correspondent Brian Ross reported on the close relationship between DeConcini and Parry and Romani. The report suggested the lobbyists had cashed in on their political connections. The facts are there. President Romano Romani, seen here with the Senator, once worked on DeConcini's Senate staff. Robert Mills was also an aide to Senator DeConcini before he joined Parry and Romani. He had worked with DeConcini on the original air interdiction legislation. And Ted Mehl-he also worked on the aerostat legislation as a Congressional aide. He then became Parry and Romani's chief Congressional lobbyist for the aerostats.

In 1991, Parry and Romani's connections apparently paid off when it successfully lobbied for the funding of four new aerostats. Parry and Romani's client, a company called TCOM, also won the lion's share of the contract, worth more than $100 million.

Jack Blum became familiar with Parry and Romani's connections to DeConcini while working as a Senate investigator in the late 1980s.

Mr. BLUM: What I'm saying is that former staff very effectively sold the program to their boss. And there's a lot of money here and the contractors who want that went to this group of former staff and said, "Hey, sell it to the boss." Now, that has gone on all the time and it has happened with great frequency.

NARRATOR: What has also happened is that DeConcini has benefited. These Federal Election Commission reports from Senator DeConcini's re-election campaign list the following contributors: Parry and Romani lobbyists; Charles Craig, a TCOM owner; and numerous PACs of air interdiction manufacturers. Together they have contributed thousands of dollars since 1989. We asked DeConcini about the Parry and Romani contributions.

Sen. DeCONCINI: The fact that they contribute to my campaign, I would more suspect it's not because they're doing business with Customs, it's because they know me, because I worked with-they worked for me or they feel I'm an honest candidate.

Let the bidding begin!

Call Congress Now

Excellent follow-up, Bill, thereby reminding every Narcosphere reader who's a U.S. citizen to contact their congressional representatives and ask them what they think about this project -- specifically in light of past failures that you chronicle in your comment.

Click here to locate your House representative.

Click here to locate your Senator.

User login