Language

Reporter's Notebook: Al Giordano

Where's Lula? The Decree that Hasn't Come

According to Brazilian government records, President Lula da Silva's expected presidential decree authorizing decriminalization of drug users, the creation of safe-use rooms for injected drug users, and the change in the name of the lead agency from "National Anti-Drug Secretary" to "National Secretary about Drugs," was not issued on November 24th.

As reported last week by the daily Folha de Sao Paulo (and translated by Narco News) the various drug policy agencies in Lula's administration had reportedly come to a "consensus" for a policy change that would be signed by Lula this past Wednesday.

However, the national drug czar, General Paulo Uchoa, did give a media interview on Wednesday in which he said there will be safe-use houses for injected drug users established... but only in an "experimental" manner...

Let's read the tea leaves of the information that is available today... A presidential decree had been promised making the new pro-Harm Reduction drug policies official this week, but Lula signed only two presidential decrees (#5,823 and #5,824) on Wednesday, neither of them having anything to do with Harm Reduction or drug policies.

The agency known as SENAD (National Antidrug Secretary) has not changed its name as listed on it's website, but does have a new and apocryphal document titled "National Policy About Drugs" - the title (Politica Nacional sobre Drogas) is consistent with the promised name change. There is a link to download the document... but the document has been removed!

Meanwhile, in an interview on the "Bom Dia Brasil" ("Good Morning Brazil") program on the Globo TV network, given by national drug czar Paulo Roberto Uchoa (considered to be one of the drug war "hawks" in the Lula administration who had been blocking the new consensus), the czar creates some clarity and also some confusion...

Q. One project that is causing a lot of discussion inside and outside of the government is the project of creating safe use salons, where drug users will be able to use drugs with syringes provided by the Health Ministry. Do you, Sir, think this project is ready to go?

Paulo Roberto Uchôa: We're not going to mix policies. The delivery of syringes is a very serious work that the Health Ministry is doing as it seeks to regulate the Harm Reduction situation in the country. As far as the safe-use salons go, this is not going to happen yet, because the Health Ministry has proposed it as an experimental work, at the university level, with very rigid controls by the Ministry - and only in extremely serious cases. At the same time, this is an idea that still hasn't been approved for launch in Brazil. That's why the safe-use rooms aren't beginning yet.

So, how to read that? He says it's not happening but it is happening, only he calls the program of safe-use rooms "experimental." He did not speak to whether or not the "experimental" program would still include 250 safe-use houses or not.

It seems that the "consensus" mentioned last week has hit a snag... Could it be (ya think?) that it is being blocked by a certain foreign Embassy?

Developing...

Comments

Teste de repercursão

O anúncio do decreto que deveria ser assinado no dia 24 funcionou como um tubo de ensaio para o governo brasileiro. Mas como as pressões em contrário foram maiores, o decreto não foi assinado. Como os responsáveis pela política sobre drogas do Brasil puderam recuar tão rápido a ponto de dizer que as salas de uso seguro não estão sequer em cogitação? A proposta divulgada na Folha de São Paulo, a qual não foi atribuida diretamente a ninguém na esfera governamental, gerou muita discussões nos principais jornais brasileiros e trazia um clima de concensso governamental a respeito do tema. A Folha não trouxe outra reportagem mostrando o recuo do governo e apurando os motivos.

Talvez isso seja um vício não só do poder executivo, mas também do poder legislativo em que há um projeto de lei para despenalização do uso de drogas. O projeto foi aprovado na câmara dos deputados e encaminhado ao senado. Mas não há mais notícias. O goveno brasileiro e a falta de apuração dos jornais brasileiros facilitam com que as publicações sirvam de teste de aceitação para as medidas governamentais.  

Test of repercussions

Translation: "Teste de repercursão" by Daniel Fleming

The announcement of the decree [to decriminalize drug use] that would have been signed on November 24th functioned as an assessment pipe ("trial balloon") for the Brazilian government.  But as the pressures against the decree had been bigger than those for it, the decree was not signed.  How were those responsible for the politics on drugs in Brazil able to withdraw so fast their stated point that the rooms of safe use are not at least in consideration?  The proposal divulged in Folha São Paulo, which was not attributed directly to anyone in the governmental sphere, generated many quarrels in main Brazilian periodicals and brought a governmental climate of consensus regarding the subject.  Folha did not bring another news article showing the leaning of the government and selecting the reasons.  Perhaps this is a vice not only of the executive, but also of the legislative where it has a proposed law for depenalizing the use of drugs.

The bill was approved in the house of representatives and directed to the Senate.  But there is no more notice.  The lack of verification of Brazilian periodicals helped the Brazilian government use the publications to test the acceptance of proposed governmental measures.

(Translated with a big assist from Google/Altavista.  Next time ... or this time ... someone who speaks Portuguese can translate for the rest of us.  We should be doing more translating into Spanish and Portuguese as well... said the monolingual.)

User login