Toppling a Coup, Part VII: A School of Leaders in Honduras

By Al Giordano

75 young Afro-Honduran community organizers gathered this weekend in La Ceiba and issued a call for a November 2010 referendum for a new Constitution. D.R. 2009 Samuel Molina.

AUGUST 30, 2009, LA CEIBA, HONDURAS: Scratch the surface of the de facto Honduran coup regime and its architects can’t help but demonstrate, again and again, that one of its unspoken reasons to exist is their unbridled racism toward considerable sectors of the national and international community. The July comment by its make-believe “foreign minister” that referred to US President Barack Obama as “that little nigger” was not an isolated gaffe: Coup “president” Roberto Micheletti has additionally installed the country’s most infamously bigoted politician, Rafael Pineda Ponce, as his very own chief of staff.

As the de facto regime’s “minister of government,” Pineda Ponce has suddenly found new relevance in Honduran political life. Before the coup plotters rescued him from obscurity, Pineda Ponce was a disgraced and largely forgotten 2001 presidential candidate on the Liberal Party line who lost to President Ricardo Maduro largely due to the total rejection Pineda Ponce faced from the Afro-Honduran population after he referred to those citizens sneeringly as “monkeys” that hang from trees.

Rafael Pineda Ponce, “government minister” for the Honduran coup regime, has portrayed Afro-Hondurans as “monkeys” hanging from trees.

“We can’t spend our lives contemplating the sunsets and the palm trees with monkeys hanging from them,” he had complained in front of a reporter for a national daily newspaper in 1998, in reference to the Garifuna and Afro-Honduran communities that populate much of the northern coast. That was the region that Pineda Ponce sought to open to foreign investment and tourist mega-resorts. And although the Liberal Party has traditionally received healthy support from Afro-Hondurans, who are ten percent of the population, Pineda Ponce did not win in a single municipality with significant Afro-Honduran presence in the 2001 elections, a vote he lost by eight percentage points nationwide.

Pineda Ponce’s 1998 racist gaffe came in the context of his crusade then to change the Honduran Constitution to eliminate article 107, which says:

“State lands, communal farms or private property located in the border regions with neighboring states, or along the coasts of both seas, extending 40 kilometers inland, and those of the islands, keys, reefs and sand banks can only be acquired, possessed or deeded to Hondurans by birth, by companies governed entirely by Honduran partners or by State institutions, and any act or contract to the contrary will be declared null and void.”

Pineda Ponce’s point was that development by foreign companies of hotels and tourist attractions along Honduras Caribbean coast was, he felt, somehow inhibited because of the preponderance of black Hondurans who live and work near the beaches. (The apparent desire of some North American expats to enable or overlook the race hatred of top coup leaders may also have something to do with their own fixations on owning villas and manses near the beach while Article 107 remains inconveniently in place, as journalist Belén Fernández explores in her story today, The Parable of the Honduran Congresswoman and the Gringa Blogger.)

Community organizer Celeo Alvarez Casildo remembered this history while speaking to the 70 young adults who had been selected to represent their communities at the XVIII National Gathering of Afro-Honduran Youth held this past weekend in La Ceiba.

ODECO strategist Celeo Alvarez Casildo speaks to the National Gathering of Afro-Honduran Youth about the art of community organizing. D.R. 2009, Samuel Molina.

During a Friday morning plenary session, Alvarez had recounted the history of how the national Organization of Community and Ethnic Development (ODECO, in its Spanish initials) has influenced presidential candidates over the past three elections to sign detailed campaign promises. “In 2001, four of the five national candidates came to sign our pledges. But the Liberal Party candidate who is now government minister didn’t come. Why didn’t he come?”

A young man stood up to answer: “He made comments about how we have to remove the monkeys from the beaches. That’s something we could never stand.”

It’s a part of their history that the young Afro-Hondurans, most of whom were still children when it happened eleven years ago, remember very well, for the collective shock and polemic it generated at the time and for the gains won by ODECO when it organized around and against Pineda Ponce’s remarks. Not only was the candidate’s presidential campaign hung by his own words, but his proposed elimination of Article 107 – against which tens of thousands of Afro-Hondurans and others organized and mobilized, knowing that the proposal was principally aimed at taking away their coastal and communal lands – went crashing down to defeat with him.

Despite or perhaps because they must live daily with such prejudiced attitudes by the white and Ladino Hondurans that dominate the country’s institutions (paradoxically, the most powerful business magnates in the country are themselves part of ethnic minorities of Arab or Jewish descent), the Afro-Honduran population has made giant strides in the past two decades since ODECO formed in 1992 and applied a community organizing model to its anti-discrimination efforts.

“Our history is one of racial, political, economic, cultural and environmental racism and discrimination,” Alvarez told the assembled youths. “We had to organize ourselves. Nothing that we have today fell from the sky. All of it is the result of an organized struggle.”

The building where the gathering was held is living testimony to the fast growth of ODECO as a force in Honduran life. It indeed did not fall from the sky but was constructed, one floor at a time, from the ground up. The lot it stands upon cost $34,000 dollars, donated by a Norwegian human rights NGO. The foundation was laid in May 2004 and the first floor completed that October. The third floor assembly hall was inaugurated on September 30, 2006. The entire building, including dormitories with 64 beds, cost about $210,000 US dollars to build, much of that donated by human rights NGOs from Ireland. Construction contractors have estimated that the structure would have cost more than one million dollars to build commercially, but ODECO was able to do it on a relative shoestring thanks to the donated labor by hundreds of Hondurans during its construction.

Community Organizer Celeo Alvarez Casildo at the Satuye Cultural Center that ODECO rose up from a vacant lot in the Isla barrio of La Ceiba. D.R. 2009 Samuel Molina.

Alvarez – who directs a staff of thirty from the complex, each of whom, in addition to their titled duties is required to also be a “promotor,” the word they use for community organizer – continued his talk on Friday morning: “In 1992 – raise your hand if you were already born then – everyone thought we wouldn’t go out into the streets because we were afraid. But we went door-to-door, neighborhood-to-neighborhood, community-to-community. We called it ‘ant’s work.’ I didn’t think more than a hundred people would come to our first demonstration. All I could promise is that I would show up with my family. When the day came, more than 5,000 marched down San Isidro Avenue. The street turned black.”

“Who led the march?” he asked, then answering: “The young people, and also children and senior citizens did. We went into the streets with our drums. Our drums have accompanied this process since the beginning. Last night at this event’s inauguration the energy was high because our culture was here with us, and with us the voices of the ancestors, as we go forward constructing the new nation, the new community. A better future for the community depends on each one of you.”

Alvarez frequently points out that his organization participates in only three marches a year: Each April 12 commemorating the arrival of Garifunas to Honduras after winning their freedom from slavery on the island of San Vicente; each May 1 when it marches with the country’s workers for Labor Day; and each October 12, together with indigenous peoples, on the anniversary of the arrival of Colombus to the New World. “The rest of the year we do the real work,” he noted: “that of organizing.”

“You have to keep on moving,” he urged the youths. “If you stand still, nothing happens. You have to move. The power to negotiate is born from mobilization.”

Advancing in Times of Retreat

During two decades when labor unions and other progressive forces in Honduras and elsewhere have suffered declining membership, and while the electoral left has won only a couple handfuls of congressional seats, the community organizing model of the Afro-Hondurans has brought them a unique power in Honduran society to obligate politicians and institutions to address their grievances.

A milestone of this emergent power came last March 19 when each of the presidential candidates nominated by the five national political parties signed a written list of thirty campaign pledges that ODECO had put before them. So well organized is the community that the politicians didn’t dare not sign.

Among the promises now unanimously made by the presidential candidates: To budget $12 million US dollars to complete the process of regularizing land titles in Afro-Honduran and indigenous communities, $2 million in economic development funds, $8 million for improvement of electricity, potable water and telecommunications systems in their communities, $10 million for development of tourism in Afro-Honduran communities (many of which are along the north coast beaches) and the construction of a Garifuna Tourism School with an annual budget of $1.5 million, $20 million for local municipalities to democratically plan community development, a $500,000 annual budget for the National Commission Against Racism, $265,000 to support Afro-Honduran History Month activities each July, $5 million for a new government department for Afro-Honduran and Indigenous Development, a $2 million annual budget to treat HIV-AIDS patients, $25 million to improve public schools in minority communities, $500,000 a year toward the creation of the International Afro-Descendent Institution (including the School of Formation of Afro-Descendent Leaders in Human Rights, Communications and Investigation, ODECO’s “School of Leaders”), $2.5 million for the collection and preservation of ancestral song, dance and arts, $1.2 million annually for learning institutions the preserve Garifuna tradition, a fifty percent increase in the budget of the Garinagu Cultural Center of Honduras, $2.5 million to construct an International Garifuna Museum in La Ceiba, $2 million for the Indigenous House of Culture, $10 million annually for environmental clean up and preservation in Afro-Honduran and indigenous communities.

That $104.9 million dollars in specific commitments was signed by National party candidate Pepe Lobo, Liberal party candidate Elvin Santos, Democratic Unity candidate Cesar Ham, Democratic Christian party candidate Felicito Avila Ordóñez, and Bernard Martínez Valerio of the Social Democratic party. (The sixth presidential candidate, Independent Carlos Reyes, had not yet qualified for the ballot last March when the pledge signing ceremony was held.)

And that’s not all. Beyond the $104 million US dollars in specific budgetary promises, the organization extracted the following additional pledges from the abovementioned presidential aspirants: Protections for indigenous and Afro-Honduran populations in the DR-CAFTA “free trade” agreement between Central America, the Dominican Republic and the United States, government supported advertising and communications campaigns against racism and intolerance, ratification by Honduras of the Inter American Convention Against Racism, Discrimination and Intolerance, stronger laws to guarantee proportional representation in national, state and local government, a commitment that Afro-Hondurans and indigenous will constitute at least thirty percent of the next president’s cabinet, diplomatic and other top positions, support for public safety and housing construction in minority communities, better use of the Census to accurately measure minority populations, 500 scholarships per year for Afro-Honduran and indigenous secondary education, 500 scholarships per year for the same in universities, reform of the laws establishing the Honduran Institute of Anthropology and History for it to better recognize and preserve Afro-Honduran and indigenous culture, and adhesion by Honduras to international labor, environmental and anti-discrimination treaties that its governments have so far failed to sign.

D.R. 2009, Samuel Molina.

ODECO’s reach extends to judicial and military authorities, too. When some years back soldiers of the Armed Forces killed four Garifuna fishermen for allegedly floating their boats into a nature preserve, the organization made such a noise that military General Romeo Vásquez Velásquez – more infamous today as the executor of the June 28 coup d’etat – and his joint chiefs of staff had to head up to La Ceiba to try to calm the storm: ODECO organized hundreds of citizens to meet them in a public assembly and demand justice. The offending soldiers were prosecuted for their crime.

The June 28 coup and its aftermath have created a new set of challenges for ODECO. Prior to Thursday night’s inauguration of the national youth gathering, the de facto government’s vice minister of youth, Randy Garcia, who is Afro-Honduran, asked ODECO for an invitation to attend. The request was declined. “We won’t have anything to do with that government,” Alvarez told Narco News.

During the Friday morning session, Alvarez passed the wireless microphone to the youths, seated in a large circle in the third floor assembly hall, and asked them to take turns reading aloud the 30 numbered campaign pledges signed by the presidential candidates. When one young woman struggled with the pronunciation of some government agency titles in the text and some other youths laughed, Alvarez interrupted: “Companeros, ¿que pasa? We learn to swim by swimming and we learn to read by reading. Do not worry if you trip over the words. This is how we move forward, learning.”

He spoke to the youths of the importance of reading, citing historic leaders like Martin Luther King, Mohandas Gandhi, Marcus Garvey, Nelson Mandela “and Malcolm X, who said ignorant people don’t win any battles. What did these leaders all have in common? They were studious people. You have to read. You have to form yourselves. He who claims to be a leader and doesn’t know anything just ends up tricking the community.”

School of Leaders

A show of hands revealed that about half of the 70 youth delegates are already graduates of ODECO’s School of Formation of Afrodescendent Leaders in Human Rights, popularly known as the “School of Leaders.”

Founded in July of 2006, the School of Leaders has graduated 360 Hondurans and another 40 or so Afrodescendents from neighboring Central American nations and Mexico. A slight majority of the graduates to date have been women. The program is offered in four courses that are held one week each month for four months, with 30 to 40 students in each session and professors from Honduras, Guatemala, Perú, the United States and elsewhere. Local community organizations choose the students – who range from ages 12 to 30, most of them around 19 or 20 years old - and graduates participate in raising the travel funds for new students from their communities to go to future sessions in La Ceiba where ODECO’s assembly hall and dormitories are host to the school.

The first week’s course, “Afrodescendent Presence in América,” includes history from slavery through abolition to the present. Labor leader and author Pedro Brizuela of San Pedro Sula, Honduras, wrote the teaching text, titled “Leadership,” that is the basis of the first lesson. The text cites quotations from such diverse commentators on the theme as Evangelical author John C. Maxwell, Conrad Hilton and Plato. Today we translate it to English and publish it in Spanish to make it available worldwide. (Many of its planks apply equally to journalists as to social leaders, and it will surely be incorporated into the curriculum of next February’s Narco News School of Authentic Journalism in Mexico.) It speaks of the difference between a “leader” and a mere “boss,” and lists 21 indispensable qualities of a leader: Character, charisma, commitment, communication, ability, bravery, discernment, focus, generosity, initiative, listening skills, passion, positive attitude, problem solving, relationship cultivating, responsibility, self confidence, self discipline, service, capacity to learn, and vision.

D.R. 2009 Samuel Molina.

The second weeklong course is titled “The Philosophical Conception of National and International Laws that Protect Human Rights.” The third is, “Struggle and Daily Life of Afrodesendents.” And the fourth is, “Defense of the Rights of Afrodescendent Communities.”

The School of Leaders’ 191-page textbook, its second print run published in 2008, provides texts and source documents on the abovementioned themes. With ODECO’s permission we make that textbook available today in its original Spanish for free downloading. It also contains the texts of national and international laws and treaties in the areas of human rights, racial equality, labor and land law, as well as detailed study of the Honduran Constitution. It teaches how to organize to influence municipal, state and national governments, as well as a focus on how organizers can address specific problems in communities: racism, xenophobia, discrimination, intolerance, violence against women, HIV-AIDS, substance abuse, child abuse, and the nuts and bolts of participatory democracy.

Grupo de Danza ODECO, at the Thursday inaugural session of the National Gathering of Afro-Honduran Youth in La Ceiba. D.R. 2009 Samuel Molina.

The seriousness and sense of purpose of the young leaders was evident all weekend at the national youth gathering: participants agreed to abstain from alcohol or drugs during the session, keep their cell phones on vibrate, and listen carefully whenever any of them speaks. Virtually every intervention by a participant is applauded, no matter how short or long the statement. The participants received three delicious meals a day from head chef Sonia and her kitchen staff. The students participate in trust building exercises and social events such as a presentation of dance and song in the Garifuna language on Thursday:

Añahei gurigia mafiñehaña luagu wanichigu

Wanichigu wedewese

Wanichigu wedewese

Higarugu, Higarugu, Higarugu, Higarugu

Higarugu niburetiñu garinago

The song – a call to the youth to believe in the knowledge of the ancestors and the power of the young; the chorus sings, “Come, Come, Come Garifuna Youth” - was not an ancient traditional ballad but, rather, an original composition by Guillermo Tómas, one of the youths at the gathering who works teaching Garifuna language classes for ODECO.

Subjects, Not Objects

Alvarez, in his Friday presentation, explained that the thirty campaign promises signed by the presidential candidates were themselves the result of a democratic process among Afro-Hondurans at the grassroots level.

“Did ODECO invent these demands?,” he asked aloud. “No. This was the result of a lot of work, meetings in the communities where the people put forward ideas. They were elaborated and put on paper.”

“These demands are not exclusive to afrodescendant communities. They also include the indigenous. We need to construct alliances with other sectors. The indigenous have similar problems to our own,” he stressed. “Nothing falls from the sky! You need to light the torch to continue with organized struggle to accomplish anything.”

Alvarez then explained that a big task will come to force the next president – product of the scheduled November 29 election that has been stained by the fall of constitutional order in the country – to comply with those promises. “Once elected, then comes the job of vigilance, of insistence, so that they keep these campaign promises. Someone once said that nothing is achieved without the people’s will. But nothing is maintained without a push from the institutions.”

He then outlined the kind of process that will be needed to force the government to comply with the presidential pledges, inventing the names of three Hondurans to tell the story. “It will look something like this: ‘Chepe Martinez’ and ‘Filomena Castro’ and ‘Candido Garcia’ form a commission to monitor and evaluate compliance with the promises. But to get to Tegucigalpa, Filomena, Candido and Chepe need transportation, lodging and food. They need to get from their communities to the capital and then must be able to move inside the capital. They’ll need to be able to pay the telephone bills. They need certain conditions. If they don’t have them they won’t be able to arrive, speak on telephone, or follow up on the promises. It takes an organization to make that happen.”

“What comes next?” he asks. “That depends on the responsibility and capability that we have. Are you subjects or objects? What are we?”

“Subjects!” chant the youths.

“You, what are you?”

“Subject!”

“We have voice. We think. We act. We feel. We want them to see us as subjects. Very few communities in Honduras have what we have. We already have this commitment. We are not the object of anyone.”

During the Saturday session of the national youth gathering, the assembled watched the second half of a Spanish language translation of the PBS documentary, A Force More Powerful, about nonviolent action, civil resistance and strategic planning. At the closing event, a group of youths offered a theater performance portraying a courtroom scene in which the HIV virus was put on trial – his defense waged by “Attorney Ignorance” – and the Grupo de Danza ODECO culminated the conference in red, gold and green vestments offering a traditional dance.

The trainings and lessons taught both inside and outside the Satuye Cultural Center are evidently relevant to the situation that all of Hondurans, not just its Afrodescendent population, are living today under the impositions of a coup regime.

In the past three years, Celeo Alvarez Casildo and ODECO have quietly risen up a peaceful army of almost 400 highly trained community organizers who go about their work with seriousness, dedication and also great joy and camaraderie. In a decade of reporting on the social movements throughout the hemisphere, we have seen no other Latin American community organizing training program as advanced as ODECO’s School of Leaders and, as word spreads about it and its resulting field organizing, it seems only than a matter of time until the art of community organizing that it teaches comes into popular demand throughout the rest of Honduran population, particularly among the youth.

When Leaders Lead

Not content to merely title themselves leaders with a diploma, the youths gathered for the conference to actually lead. They discussed their views of the current political crisis in Honduras and then delegated half a dozen from their ranks to draft a declaration based on their collective conclusions.

The declaration denounced the “violation of human rights” by the coup regime that stole power on June 28. It offered support to the Arias plan to restore President Manuel Zelaya to the post to which he was elected. But the youths’ interpretation of that plan may differ significantly from that of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: their most prominent demand was that on the last Sunday of November in 2010, the people of Honduras vote in a national plebiscite to create a process to write, democratically, a new Constitution for the nation. (The conditions of the Plan Arias that is backed by Washington prohibit President Manuel Zelaya from promoting a constitutional convention upon his negotiated return to the presidency. With this declaration, the Afro-Honduran youth – organized at an advanced level that surely ought to impress and prick the conscience of the community organizer that currently occupies the White House - have made it crystal clear that no such deal applies to them or their aspirations for a more democratic Honduras. With or without Zelaya’s return, they’re organizing for a new Constitution.)

Many groups and individuals make declarations, but this one comes from a network of highly trained organizers with the capacity and infrastructure to mobilize a lot of noise and light upon its demand. Higarugu niburetiñu garinago… The Garifuna youth is coming to make sure that the popular demand for a new Honduran Constitution shall not be lost in the maneuvers by the powers up above.

After the youths read aloud and unanimously approved of the declaration, Celeo Alvarez addressed the youths. “This declaration will surely go around the world,” he said, expressing pride in their “coherence” and passion for justice. Alvarez said he would take the declaration of the youths next month to Washington DC where he and other Afrodescendent leaders from throughout the hemisphere will meet from September 21-25 under the banner of ONECA, the Central American Black Organization, which has deep connections with US Civil Rights organizations, leaders, community organizers and the Congressional Black Caucus. Alvarez was ONECA’s president for its first 14 years, and is a member of its governing board. While in Washington, he will be available for interviews and meetings, and may be contacted via email at calvarez@caribe.hn

So that no one around the world, in Washington or anywhere else, will need his or her spectacles to read it, here’s the money ‘graph - the only part of it for which they wrote some words in ALL CAPS, for emphasis - of the youths’ declaration, when they call for:

“The convocation of a PLEBISCITE so that the citizenry can vote on the writing of a NEW CONSTITUTION, with clear guarantees for wider and more representative participation among all sectors of the Honduran people. This plebiscite should be held on the last Sunday of November of 2010.”

And that you are reading the youths’ declaration – here is the full text translated to English and here in Spanish, including the signatures of the 75 young community organizers that co-authored it – is evidence that their call for a November 2010 national referendum for new Constitution has already begun its journey across the planet and throughout the larger School of Leaders that is a country named Honduras.

 

Comments

OFRANEH and ODECO and other matters

Informative but lacking a broader context and some subtly. Does OFRANEH still exist? ODECO tends to couch its demands (at least according to some) in terms of integration w/in the neoliberal Honduran State while OFRANEH tends to oppose itself to the State. If OFRANEH still exists have you had any contact with them? Where do they stand in all of this?

 

Also no one is of "Jewish" or "Arab" descent unless you believe in something like Jewish or Arab blood, which I hope you do not since such a position biologizes and essentializes what are historical and cultural identities. Would you identify someone as of "Catholic" or "European" descent? If so, why? Perhaps ancestors self-identified as Jewish or Arab but that doesn't indicate a thing about how people might self-identify today. Did you mean to say that Jews and Arabs are also considered ethnic minorities by the State? Or that some groups also consider themselves ethnic minorities?

 

The Afro appelation indicates zip about Garifuna or Creoles. It emerges here as elsewhere in Latin America from the imposition of a U.S. system of "race" classification that ends up fracturing minority groups as they fight with others over the crumbs. Precisely what the State wants to happen within its new multicultural citizen regimes.

latin american oligarchs

If one studies Latin American history, you can see a general pattern of economic development guided by the oligarchy's policies.

They have almost always believed in free trade, profit and Western-styles of development.  If the cultures, life-styles, economic organizations or land use policies of indigenous peoples or campesinos get in their way, the oligarchs use coercive legal, extra-legal or military actions to clear them out or exterminate them.

The oligarch's have been able to follow their disasterous economic policies because they possess a military that protects them from the consequences of their actions.

In addition, the oligarchs have usually depended on the Church or evangelical Protestants to ideologically instruct the poor to accept their fate.  (The oligarchically controlled media play the same role.)

If the Church and military (and national police) were not in place, both the oligarchs and their economic policies would disappear in a fortnight.

Because the oligarchs in the US know the above, they train the military bosses, introduce inappropriately advanced military technology and organization, funnel large amounts of military aid, and distribute US corporate sponsered newscasts, bankroll evangelical missionary efforts and give public support and financial contributions to conservative Churchmen.

These groups believe that they represent "civilization" while those groups in their way represent "barbarism."  In actuality, rapacious capitalism and oligarchical rule are both barbaric.  The barbaric consequences are the slide into racism, genocide and ethnocide. 

In return, most Latin Americans receive the gifts of poverty, random violence, destruction of natural habitats, severe pollution, swollen cities, mono-agriculture, farming and manufacturing for export instead of internal needs, and a rigid, thoughtless and empty intellectual and cultural life.

Who could ask for anything more?

@ Laurie

Laurie - I love ya, but I could not disagree more with your insistence - if that's what you're saying - on using definitions different than ODECO and the National Gathering of Afro-Honduran Youth use to describe themselves.

Both are groups that are inclusive of both Garifuna (those who speak the Garifuna language and/or share other cultural practices) and Afro-Hondurans (which encompasses all black folk in the country, no matter what language they speak, much like the term African-Americans that was proposed in 1988 by Jesse Jackson and others in the US and has come into popular use since then).

In the end, we call people what they call themselves. Doing anything different would be bad journalism.

I'd also like to state emphatically that writing about one Afro-Honduran organization does not in any way compete with or say anything negative or at all about any other organization that organizes among Garifunas, black folk, Afro-Hondurans, or whatever peoples wish to call themselves.

I went to report on ODECO intensively because it is the only grassroots organization I have found in Honduras so far that, A. does door-to-door community organizing (which I consider to be the superior model for social change based on a long analysis of what models win their battles and which do not across Latin America and the world), and that B. offers such an intensive training for its community organizers and youth.

This is not the first time I have heard a foreign observer or commentator try to create what I think is a false dichotomy between ODECO and OFRANEH, which I think is a very dangerous and slippery slope when outsiders begin to imply that there are "good" or "bad" organizations representing those constituencies in Honduras or anywhere, especially when regarding organizations of minority populations. Reporting on the high legitimacy of one does not declare any other illegitimate. It is ODECO that made the news I reported here and on another day, if I write about news made by OFRANEH, it will likewise not say anything negative or positive about ODECO or anyone else.

As far as I'm concerned, the autonomy and self-management of any organization that defines its own terms for itself and its constituents is sacrosanct, and of far more importance to me than whatever terms outsiders wish to put upon them.

Finally, the discussion of whether anyone can be of Arab or Jewish descent is a sideshow to this story that I really don't care about. I have met thousands of people in this life that consider themselves to be of both, just as I consider myself to be of Italian and Irish descent, and also of Catholic descent. It is certainly an open polemic in Honduran society where - unlike in much of the world where the two groups are considered to be quite different - the financial might of some prominent members of those groups, from the Facusses to the Rosenthals, causes many to - whether rightly or wrongly - see them as more similar than distinct. My point is that while some sectors discriminate against others in Honduras based on race, some of those discriminators themselves come from minorities. Whether you want to call them ethnic or religious or any other term is an academic side show that I just don't care about resolving myself. I think people of common sense everywhere understand what I've written, regardless of what terminology anybody else wants me to use.

@Al

Love you too. I was not insisting that you use different definitions. I was pointing out that Afro needs a history in the Honduran context as well as in other Latin American contexts. Part of that history is the imposition of the Afro appellation, which is then taken up by some local people (not where I work in Mexico, however, despite the best efforts of outsiders and local intellectuals), and often works against effective organizing because it entails distinctions that are somewhat false and pits people against each other. I understand that as a journalist it would be a lot to ask for you to acknowledge such a history and its repurcussions. I also understand why I am a cultural anthropologist and not a journalist, even though I come from a family of journalists.

Also wondering where OFRENAH is in all of this and whether ODECO and OFRENAH are working together. Clearly not if ODECO is doing all of the organizing. However, I inserted a parenthetical in the distinction between OFRENAH and ODECO because I am not a Honduran specialist, even though I do write about the politics of multiculturalism and the state in Latin America. Juliet Hooker (2005) has an excellent summary of the issues throughout LA; Mark Anderson (2007) specifically on Honduras.

I "do" race so my warning lights go on for those bits. It disturbs me when journalistic wording elides the fact that race is a social construct and all that such construction entails, precisely because your writing enters into the mainstream.

Tremendous resources; thanks for publishing and publicizing

Al, that's tremendous that you're posting the organizing handbook. Thanks for that and the news about the young leaders' resolutions. The November 2010 constitutional referendum is a specific, achievable, and measurable goal (to put it in Farmworkers' organizing terminology ;>) -- suitable for being taken up by the upcoming national conference of the National Front in Resistance to the Coup on September 6.

Great article Al, and another point for Laura

Al, this is the best article on ODECO I've ever read in English or Spanish, and the School of Leaders certainly deserves the publicity.

I just have to comment on Laura's comment, since I found it frustratingly misinformed. The language she uses also screams grad studentitis. First, the term "afro-descendent" as it is currently used thorughout Latin America, came directly out of an AGREEMENT among activists at a Durban-related conference in Santiago, Chile. It is NOT, as she says, in icky academeze, "from the imposition of a U.S. system of "race" classification that ends up fracturing minority groups as they fight with others over the crumbs. Precisely what the State wants to happen within its new multicultural citizen regimes." Afro-descendent is meant to be used as a pan identity to UNITE disparate groups as they organize in the region. Frankly, I thought everyone who knew about Afro-descendent organizing in the hemisphere knew where that term comes from, especially my fellow academics. 

The reason ODECO uses the term "Afro-descendents" and/or "Afro-Hondurans" instead of the term "Garifuna" is because not all black Hondurans are Garifuna. Nothing more needs to be said about this at all.

I also agree that the OFRANEH/ODECO polarization is unnecessary and not useful at all. Currently, ODECO has greater organizing capacity, partly due to this leadership school, which is the focus of the article. 'nuf said.

Laura's comment on ethnicity is really offensive to me, both as an anthropologist and personally. Nobody is of Jewish descent? Are you kidding me? Spend some more time on the ground before making inflammatory statements like this. 'nuf said here as well. 

A side note - this year Celeo was nominated for a Nobel Prize for the regional organizing he did as President (until this Dec) and founder of ONECA. Not too shabby either, huh!

 

@Betsy

Betsy, I am not a graduate student. Far from it. My point is precisely that activists define the terms rather than the people themselves. Afro does have roots in the U.S. system of hypodescent. If you want references I'm happy to provide them. Perhaps you need to spend more time studying race -- especially the racialization of Jews -- before you take offense at my comments. Might I just add that your tone and language are rather inappropriate for a discussion. "Nuf" said not because I don't want to say more but because I have to run.

@Betsy

Sorry I had to leave for a bit there. On Afro as emerging from a U.S. model see Peter Wade (Colombia); George Reid Andrews (Brazil but also general); Odile Hoffmann (Mexico); Arturo Motta (Mexico); G. Reginald Daniel (Brazil and U.S.); Moore (Cuba); Torres-Saillant (DR); John McDowell (Mexico); Isar Godreau (PR). I'll stop there. There is nothing unusual about my position.

 

Of course Afro is a term meant to unite. That doesn't mean that it does; nor does it mean that it shouldn't be examined in the context of indigenous social movements (back to Wade, Hooker and Anderson, the last two mentioned in my first post). And yes, I am completely aware of the fact that not all "Afro"Hondurans are Garifuna, as my first post indicates. My point about OFRANEH and ODECO was also already explained.

 

Lastly, if you think "Jewish" has anything to do with biological descent maybe you should also read up on that scholarship. I'd start with Sander Gilman, Robert Procter, Nadia Abu El-Haj and Eric Goldstein. Judaism is a religion. It isn't in the genes. Are you a graduate student? My undergraduate -- not to mention my graduate -- students are way beyond this stuff.

Thankyou, everyone.

I am (almost) a total outsider (to Honduras) here in Switzerland where we have our own  community struggles and collective social objectives to work out democratically and peacefully.

I have never been there-- but "as a student officer" (in the United States) I once served with a young Honduran Naval officer of "Palestinian Christian roots."

We parted company in 1975, just after the fall of Saigon, when I was commissioned in the United States Marine Corps. He was a friend who I still hold in great personal esteem...

A year or two ago I heard from him for the first time in over 30 years (I still consider him an admirable person), but earlier this year I squabbled (via e-mail) with one of his brothers who, though expressing concern for the poor and the marginalized as a pillar of his Roman Catholic faith, insisted that "all reasonable persons should support the golpe de estado...."

 I do not think he (or they?) held it against me (or holds/hold it now) that a Tennesseean named William Walker once ravaged Central America to re-establish the Slavery that the Spanish had abolished.

I don't think he held it against me that some of my Mother's people were Tennesseans who bought land in Missouri and then abused share-croppers to make more money.

He was (and certainly still is) a good person-and a human being, who is now a prisoner to values I find foreign.

I hope that such a man of integrity and intelligence will one day contribute his knowledge and talent to a new "post-constituant assemby" Honduras...

Here in Switzerland we are not all rich people living in a touristic tax haven "Garden of Eden."

We have the (usual) poor, working poor, retired poor, the hungry, the marginalized (handicapped & aged),  and we have large ethno-linguistic minorities who do not always benefit from adequate social integration or fair returns on their economic production and potential...

As Al has pointed out, though, sometimes such "minorities" actually enjoy "priviledge" in certain contexts....

Some Greeks (accompanied by Turks and Armenians), for example, came (to Switzerland) as priviledged and wealthy individuals or clans to place wealth and consolidate fortunes. Others came as penniless and unskilled refugees from Ottoman Turkey or the aftermath of the terrible Greek Civil War that the Truman Administration once financed...

We also have "globalized Liberal Democratic Oligarchs" (in Switzerland) who try to hide and banalize such issues by presenting a united front  or other diversions and tactics to divide Progressives.....

My ideological viewpoints or personal constructs of what is going on  (in Honduras) might have (some abstract) bearing-but might risk being being very unwelcome. I hope I am not being obnoxious?

During the Balkan Wars in Bosnia (with which I had some experience)-and the expressed popular aspirations of resistants in the Kossovo (where I was more deeply involved, and over a far longer period) were far from "identical across the board."

.Thanks to the generous contribution of Ivan, I realize (now) that many of the people in Serbia were not monsters bent on murder or chaos, but were people as trapped by injustice and tyranny as their unfortunate "neighbors" were. In fact, the human frailities of perceived "enemies" were widely apparent even on the ground in the 1990s.

 Perhaps a parallel can now be drawn between "United States of Americans; United States of Mexicans; and United States of Hondurans?"

Were it not for Al and other Fieldhands and commentators I would find the "Americas" far too complexe to contemplate.

Somehow I stubbornly cling to my idea that we are all residents of the same planet.

 Quite often religion or language was not an issue (in "the Balkans"), but sometimes it was.

Like us (as individuals), nothing stays the same, everything changes over time.

While "Race" is a scientific false premise, it is often an every-day fact of life for those who wield it as an instrument, or those who must cope with submission to the weight of injustices .

 Like Al--I am a Swiss who is part-Irish with a partially American past....but that only has a bearing on what I make out of it...

Both English and Spanish may have idiomatic nuances (as seen from socio-cultural or historical positions) which might complicate communication (coming from an old fool like me).

What stands out in this forum, though, is a less than authoritarian approach to organization around common goals.

It was a decentralized common front once praised by Tito, objected to by Stalin, then rejected as "Utopic" and "archaic" by Miloseviç.

Here I perceive Al as a real revolutionary (not as a journalist) because he keeps to the theme of a common front against common obstacles. Everyone who contributes (constructively) is an important cog in our machinery....

In Europe we have suffered (on the Left) from too much authoritarianism (some is essential to any social enterprise) and too much infighting among ourselves.

When Al tells Laurie how much he "loves her" I don't think he is belittling her competances or understanding (which are far above my level).

 He is reminding all of us of the priorities in this struggle.

When folks correct me, I either agree and try to correct my thinking, or I disagree but try to put  my priorities  back where they belong.

Like Al (who seems a little younger than me) I have come to believe that organization and solidarity are essential short-term requirements to the success of a non-violent struggle.

The very outbreak of the Spanish Civil War (in 1936) spelled  failure for the Spanish Republic, an unimaginable tragedy for the Spanish people (which still inflicts unimaginable human suffering), and the foreign intervention that followed contributed to the inevitability of WWII. 

The people won WWII, btw, but at a terribly inacceptable cost to overthrow a few "golpistas."

War is tragedy and catastrophe to all but war profiteers.

 What I find pertinent in Al's and other Fieldhands' reporting and comments is the studied choice of terrain that avoids infighting among ourselves.

Once we have discredited  the Golpe de estado-or assisted the Honduran people(s) to do so (for this is their struggle,) and once they have achieved their goal of a constituant (constitutional) assembly, then Al's role (and ours) will be to continue in the defense and consolidation of a model which may well be of future value to other people(s) in other locations.....

So far this is working. If it works it will change the world that I have come to know....

Please forgive me for my half-educated ramblings. I am an old "Marine" and a Swiss citizen who is semi-literate in three or four different but "inconsequential" languages...

Brian....

Re: Toppling a Coup Part VII

Al,

Both as a 9th generation U.S. American citizen, and a cultural anthropologist that has worked with the indigenous peoples of Central, South, and North America, as my primary focus, I appreciate the candor and objectivity of your reporting. The last paragraph in your reply to "Laura Lewis" saying:

"Finally, the discussion of whether anyone can be of Arab or Jewish descent is a sideshow to this story that I really don't care about. I have met thousands of people in this life that consider themselves to be of both, just as I consider myself to be of Italian and Irish descent, and also of Catholic descent. It is certainly an open polemic in Honduran society where - unlike in much of the world where the two groups are considered to be quite different - the financial might of some prominent members of those groups, from the Facusses to the Rosenthals, causes many to - whether rightly or wrongly - see them as more similar than distinct. My point is that while some sectors discriminate against others in Honduras based on race, some of those discriminators themselves come from minorities. Whether you want to call them ethnic or religious or any other term is an academic side show that I just don't care about resolving myself. I think people of common sense everywhere understand what I've written, regardless of what terminology anybody else wants me to use."

deserves emphasis; especially when read both in the context of your article and the cogent comment made by "Frank Balzer" immediately prior to it.

The closing remark aside, his succinct appraisal of the historic impact on the indigenous peoples of this hemisphere saying,

"These groups believe that they represent "civilization" while those groups in their way represent "barbarism."  In actuality, rapacious capitalism and oligarchical rule are both barbaric.  The barbaric consequences are the slide into racism, genocide and ethnocide. 

In return, most Latin Americans receive the gifts of poverty, random violence, destruction of natural habitats, severe pollution, swollen cities, mono-agriculture, farming and manufacturing for export instead of internal needs, and a rigid, thoughtless and empty intellectual and cultural life."

speaks, however radical his language may appear to be, to the hard realities that colonialism has subjected these people to for the better part of three centuries.

The subjective impact of ideological religio-racist pseudo intellectual abstractions on these decent native agrarian cultures are nothing less than the manifestation of cultural sociopathic behavior, perpetuated under the guise of moral and ethical superiority. As fellow Americans, sharing this hemisphere, we, as U.S. citizens, should not only be supporting these budding young democracies, we should be thanking them for reminding us of our own beginnings.

The social movements of the indigenous and lower-class peoples

A brief comment.

I try to find on-the-ground reporting that shares information about the pro-democracy movement in Honduras.

Of course, this website is a fantastic place to start.  Unfortunately, I can't read much about the Honduran pro-democracy movement in the corporate-owned mainstream media.

The MSM simply ignores it.  When it gave time to coup events, it was "analyzed" as a struggle between Zelaya and the coupsters.  If the pro-democracy movements were mentioned, it was only in passing.  They were ,and are simply a backdrop. 

What amazes me, is the strength, intelligence, tactical and strategic skill the pro-democracy movements have demonstrated so far.  In addition, the members of these movements show an optimism and tenacity that makes me wonder about the US.

In Honduras, about 1% of the population has access to the Internet.  However, they have strong communitarian movements with active face-to-face grapevines and communication systems.

In contrast, in the US, many of us possess the electronic communication gimmicks that supposedly makes us better relate to each other.

In fact, I look out of my car window, and I notice every other driver has a cell phone attached to their ear or I peruse members of the strolletariat walking -unconcerned with their immediate surroundings- with a listening device attached to an ear (or ears).

Maybe our individualistic blabbering with unseen entities via these various electronic devices doesn't contribute toward actual communication and community?  They might, instead, contribute to further atomizing each of us.

In the US, we have horrible economic, social and political injustices increasingly bearing down upon us...but we aren't hitting the streets in the huge numbers as observed in Honduras.

Are we going to get fed up like the Hondurans?  -Fed up to finally do something about it.  Will we be as wise, tenacious and intelligent as the movement members of Honduras are.

 

 

@laura

I understand that you got miffed by Betsy's somewhat condescending posture. But I think that maybe you insert too much academia in the problem (speaking as a fellow academic:-) Seems to me that Al's position to call people what they call themselves is conceptually much simpler and also practical.

With respect to the Jewish descent. I understand where your concerns are coming from, being of German descent myself. However the adjective in front of descent need not design a biological property and often doesn't, see Al's catholic descent. A person of Jewish descent has people identifying themselves as Jews in his/her ancestry, nothing more or less. Nothing wrong with that, IMHO.

@laura/betsy

Wow...conversations in the post-modern era are hard! Pretty easy to drum up a number of sources for a lot of different definitions of key concepts, isn't it? Does the spirit of an argument count for anything? If not, then it is impossible to write a piece without going into endless background disclosures about these kinds of definitions.  I guess that's the utility of these comments sections, though...

U.S. cuts more than $30 million in aid to Honduras

Post new comment

Our Policy on Comment Submissions: Co-publishers of Narco News (which includes The Narcosphere and The Field) may post comments without moderation. All co-publishers comment under their real name, have contributed resources or volunteer labor to this project, have filled out this application and agreed to some simple guidelines about commenting.

Narco News has recently opened its comments section for submissions to moderated comments (that’s this box, here) by everybody else. More than 95 percent of all submitted comments are typically approved, because they are on-topic, coherent, don’t spread false claims or rumors, don’t gratuitously insult other commenters, and don’t engage in commerce, spam or otherwise hijack the thread. Narco News reserves the right to reject any comment for any reason, so, especially if you choose to comment anonymously, the burden is on you to make your comment interesting and relevant. That said, as you can see, hundreds of comments are approved each week here. Good luck in your comment submission!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Support The Field

For site issues and problems logging in contact the tech team

User login

Meet the Field Hands

Meet the Field Hands in your area…

Field Hands Locals:

New chapters already forming in: North Colorado, Orange County CA, South Dakota, Cheshire County NH, Indiana, Georgia, Arizona, South Jersey NJ, Metro Motown MI, Northern New England, Texas, Iowa, Mississippi, Maryland, Smithtown/Commack NY, New Mexico, Louisville KY, Hampton Roads VA, Alabama, Philadelphia Metro PA, Oklahoma…

Don’t see a group in your region? Start one here.

RSS Feed