Conference Call: The Deliberative Transition
By Al Giordano

I just got off the phone listening-in to the "pad and pen only" press conference by Obama-Biden Transition Co-Chair John Podesta. It lasted almost an hour and I'm sure the rest of the media will report it extensively.
The first announcement contained some new rules:
- Federal Lobbyists cannot contribute financially to the transition.
- Federal lobbyists are prohibited from any lobbying during their work with the transition.
- If someone has lobbied in the last 12 months, they are prohibited from working in the fields of policy on which they lobbied.
- If someone becomes a lobbyist after working on the Transition, they are prohibited from lobbying the Administration for 12 months on matters on which they worked.
- A gift ban that is aggressive in reducing the influence of special interests.
These were described as the most stringent rules ever on a transition team to fulfill Obama's campaign pledges to "change the way Washington works and end the influence of lobbyists."
The transition team "will employ 450 people, with a budget of $12 million," with offices in Washington DC and Chicago. More than 100 security clearances have already been granted to team members by federal law enforcement.
Later this week, the transition will announce the members of "agency review teams" that will evaluate "over one hundred departments, agencies and commissions" to provide incoming cabinet and sub-cabinet officials with information on them. Their names will be posted at change.gov. The transition will be "the strictest and most far reaching" and the "most open and transparent in history."
Here are some additional points I gleaned from the question and answer session:
Obama won't attend the G-20 Economic Summit: "We only have one president at a time," said Podesta. "The president-elect will not be meeting with leaders who are coming to Washington. He will be in Chicago." In some cases, top aides will meet with foreign leaders while they are in DC.
Don't Expect Any Cabinet Nominations Until December: "No president other than George Herbert Walker Bush has named a cabinet member before December, going back to the Kennedy administration." Obama himself will make those announcements, mostly from Chicago. Special early attention is being given to "the economic team and the national security team." There is extensive vetting going on (no doubt Podesta remembers how President Clinton's first and second nominations for Attorney General - Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood - crashed upon the discovery that each had hired undocumented workers, which also served to mire that administration in media turmoil at the precise moment when it had wanted to hit the ground running on policy). Obama will meet with each of his cabinet secretaries in person before approving them. Podesta made a joke about the press doing "stakeouts" to try and find out with whom he is meeting.
Expect more than one token Republican: President-elect Obama "wants to see people who are not just Democrats in office, to reach out and have Republicans and Independents not just on a token level," and that will extend to sub-cabinet posts as well.
No Quid Pro Quo on Colombian Trade Deal: Podesta pushed back at press reports that President Bush had suggested exchanging his support for an economic recovery package for the US-Colombia trade agreement, which, Podesta iterated, "should be dealt with on its own merits."
Economic Recovery-Stimulus Package Will Be First Order of Business: If the previous Congress hasn't passed one already.
Every Executive Order by Bush is Under Review: Those that Obama promised during the campaign to rescind, will be eliminated immediately.
"He Intends to Close the Facility at Guantanamo": In those words.
Withdrawing from Iraq: The policy "will be consistent with what he said in the campaign."
In sum, the approach is extremely deliberative and organized to adhere exactly to promises made during the campaign. There won't likely be any "Trojan Horse" attempts to spring unannounced initiatives in the early days of the administration. No real surprise there, to anyone that has been studying Obama carefully for clues as to how he will govern.


this is why
Submitted on November 11th, 2008 by Henry Dribble (not verified)this is why we supported and vorted for this man. he is the first major political leader in modern times with no dependence on Corporate America. he is our President not theirs.
Excellent!
Submitted on November 11th, 2008 by Pamela Hilliard...Wow! This is so awesome...thanks Al for letting us know first!
waterprise2 AKA Pam
Liberal with a Capital L!
Best News
Submitted on November 11th, 2008 by Catherine Cainthat I could imagine. I echo what Henry and Pam said! How exciting to know that "of the people, by the people, for the people" really might happen in 2009.
Dreaming
Submitted on November 11th, 2008 by john in illinois (not verified)This is one administration I really wish I could work for. In my over 4 decades of work, I have only worked for one company that I could say I felt pride about my being employed there. That is not to say I didn't have pride in my work or felt good about the job I was doing. Just that pride did not necessarily extend to the company for which I labored.
This administration, however, is something that I could pride not only in the work I did but also for whom I worked.
This is why he is coming in with the highest approval ratings ever for a first term President.
Will he and his adminstration disappoint me in the future? Sure, but there is no such thing as perfection. I will have to remember to douse my disappointment with a cup of joy over what he and his adminstration will do. Heck, just overturning over 200 of Bush's executive orders immediately puts him light years ahead of any other administration in my lifetime.
Team of Rivals
Submitted on November 11th, 2008 by bonkers (not verified)Obama apparently loves this concept from Lincoln and book by Doris Kearns Goodwin.
This idea is great, where people from other ends of the political spectrum are included in the government, but I do hope Obama remembers that Noam Chomsky, Paul Krugman, Naomi Klein and others are "Rivals" as much as Chuck Hagel is a rival.
We can't accept right-wing radicals like Hagel and Traitor Joe Lieberman bending Obama's ear, while super smart, and much more often correct than any Repub people like Chomsky are relegated to the fringes.
Thanks Al!
Submitted on November 11th, 2008 by Akonuche (not verified)Thanks for the information, Al! Your measured approach through the entire business of the presidential race has been wonderful to witness. You and the other Field Hands have remained focused on what is really important without falling for the controversy dujour. I look forward to reading your reports on the incoming Obama Administration (God, if feels so great to be able to write that!).
My concern lays not so much with Obama, but with those in the Senate and the House, particularly on the Democratic side of the isle. But as Obama has proven this election cycle, when there is a people-powered movement for change to occur, nothing can stop it.
I wish that I knew a way that I could contribute to this presidency, to ensure that it is a successful, to assist with pulling this country out of the trenches. I don't know how I'd go about it, but I certainly want to help. Partaking in the Obama campaign has fostered in me this need to become more involved in a process that I otherwise didn't care a lick about.
Thanks Al
Submitted on November 11th, 2008 by joyfromillinois (not verified)I am so excited to see how he assembles his team and who is on it. This is a great time to be an American. Thanks Al for your excellent reporting.
A Very Good Question
Submitted on November 11th, 2008 by Michael ChapmanYesterday, here in Sydney Australia, I attended:
“The President-Elect: What Can We Expect?
ABC journalist Leigh Sales hosts the United States Studies Centre post-election analysis with David Brady (Stanford University), Michael Parks (former editor of the Los Angeles Times) and Geoff Garrett (US Studies Centre). Our panel examines what the vote reveals about American society, the priorities and challenges for the President Obama, and the implications for Australia and the world..”
Talk about the old politics. I almost left because the panellists seemed to have been studying a ‘different’ campaign (Obama won the old fashioned way - that old chestnut “it’s the economy”).
However, question time arrived just in time. After introducing myself as an International Fieldhand from Al Giordano’s The Field. I asked the panel to comment on community organising (another old fashioned way to win the vote) and how the new tools of the internet facilitated the Obama victory. I also noted that the Obama web strategy was moving to ‘transition’ and asked how bottom up communication with the White House via the web may be changing US society.
There were murmurs of agreement from the audience and many nodding heads. The panel acknowledged that my question was a very good one but basically admitted, due to their age, their knowledge was limited and then they got lost in FaceBook and MySpace missing the point that there are now several million community activists in the US awaiting instruction.
The questions then returned to the old politics and I left shortly after - I needed a cigarette after an hour of mind numbing babble.
Another case of ‘old white men’ missing the point and wanting to play the ‘old game’?
BondiBeachViews
list of executive orders Obama will rescind?
Submitted on November 11th, 2008 by Kristin BrickerEvery Executive Order by Bush is Under Review: Those that Obama promised during the campaign to rescind, will be eliminated immediately.
Which ones did he promise to rescind?
Reflecting back...
Submitted on November 11th, 2008 by Kathleen Harganas Al wrote awhile back... "It's morning in America..." and it just keeps on shining.
Some orders he promised to rescind
Submitted on November 12th, 2008 by Tien Le (not verified)http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/34156459.html?page=2&c=y
Obama himself has signaled, for example, that he intends to reverse Bush's controversial limit on federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, a decision that scientists say has restrained research into some of the most promising avenues for defeating a wide array of diseases.
The new president is also expected to lift a so-called global gag rule barring international family planning groups that receive U.S. aid from counseling women about the availability of abortion, even in countries where the procedure is legal, said Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
The president-elect also has said that he intends to quickly reverse the Bush administration's decision last December to deny California the authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles. "Effectively tackling global warming demands bold and innovative solutions, and given the failure of this administration to act, California should be allowed to pioneer," Obama said last January.
California had sought permission from the Environmental Protection Agency to require that greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles be cut by 30 percent between 2009 and 2016, effectively mandating that cars achieve a fuel economy standard of at least 36 mpg within eight years. Seventeen other states had promised to adopt California's rules, representing in total 45 percent of the nation's automobile market.
Other early Obama initiatives may address the need for improved food and drug regulation and chart a new course for immigration enforcement, some Obama advisers say.
The statement from Obama's
Submitted on November 12th, 2008 by Anonymous (not verified)http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed2/idUSTRE4A95CG20081112