Genius of the Year
By Al Giordano

In reflecting upon this once-in-a-lifetime year in United States politics, the big changes came from the bottom up, and mostly began under radar.
The biggest, in my view, was the emergence of the small donor in US campaigns who, replicated by hundreds of thousands (millions!) just like him and her, swamped the inordinate power of the corrupting "influence donors" and opened a new path to bypass them in the future. All future candidates for any office should have to answer this question first: Can you, like Obama, fund your campaign mainly with small donors? I can see that's going to be one of the early struggles of the next political cycles, and I expect I'll be ruthless and merciless in putting that question front-and-center. It is the most basic building-block question for authentic democracy.
Another of the huge changes that came from below: an at-first anonymous blogger at the Daily Kos by the nom-de-plume of "Poblano" developed a new and better method to aggregate polling data and demographic information and more accurately predict the outcome of elections before the vote. Poblano later uncloaked as Nate Silver, a baseball statistics wizard in Chicago, and together with Sean Quinn built fivethirtyeight.com, the political website of the year. It is now part of the legend that Silver's model predicted the presidential winner in 49 of 50 states (missing only razor-close Indiana and Nebraska's Second Congressional district).
Silver accomplished something else, too: He put the spotlight on that shadowy group of numerical alchemists known as polling and public opinion research companies, a scrutiny they had never faced before. His model weighted their results based on previous accuracy or inaccuracy, and with that was born a paradigm shift in how political junkies (and with them, the political reporting class) looked at polling data. More people understand it better - sans the mystery and hocus pocus - than ever before, and look at individual polling results more skeptically. Receiving almost a million visits a day toward the electoral climax, 538 (named for the number of votes in the Electoral College) armed and inspired a critical mass of the citizenry to think for itself rather than buying the (often errant or partisan) claims of individual big-media sponsored polling companies. From here on out, every pollster must look over his shoulder and worry more, in advance, about his and her methodologies and accuracy, and be less eager to tell the paying client what it wants to hear from the results. That has an immensely cleansing impact on the political process.
I thought about this today reading Nate's brief holiday posting, A Day Without Politics, this xmas morning from his family home in Michigan. Parents: if you want your kids to grow up to be geniuses, this passage is golden:
We're going to be taking it easy today. There are presents to unwrap -- hopefully, more exciting ones than in 2006, when my entire family dutifully bought one another copies of the Iraq Study Group Report...
That passage resonated with my long standing policy of never speaking to children, even infants, in "baby talk" (a phenomenon that strangely bleeds into human relations even after the kids have become legal adults). The infantilization of the citizenry begins very early on. I talk to kids of all ages - including my students and protégés - in the same (often gruff and no nonsense, other times irony-and-dark-humor-laden) tones with which I converse with adults. You get out what you put into them (and I've almost never met the kid that didn't appreciate it and respond in kind). And in effect, that's also part of what Silver accomplished this year: treating the citizenry as grown-ups who can analyze polling data and political dynamics for themselves without asking them to make religious leaps of faith to blindly trust the too often errant "experts."
2008 was a great year and an even greater one thanks to Silver and the team at 538. I look forward to consulting them daily in 2009 and beyond.


Parents: if you want your
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Laura M. PoyneerParents: if you want your kids to grow up to be geniuses, this passage is golden
Or at least they will grow up to be nerds! Happy holidays, everybody. My new nephew or niece will be born today and I know my sister and her husband will raise the child to be a nerd if not a genius :D
Feliz Navidad Al
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Erik SiegristI worry that the next big battle isn't going to be to find candidates that appeal to the small donor base, but to root out those who find ways to abuse it (someone will eventually figure out how to deliver 10000+ $200 donations at a pop, even if the 'bundler' is really just a media myth right now.)
As for the children, it always amazes me how quickly some people forget how much they hated getting treated like a kid when they were kids...
Merry Christmas!
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Catherine CainI read Nate's post this morning and thought the same. (But also thought that those Chinese recipes would force me to choose a possibly more edible Iraq Study Group Report!) Seriously, if Obama had run and The Field and 538 did not exist, I'm sure I would have aged a full 4 years in the Spring of 2008. Not only were both of your sites so critically informative but both had the right tone throughout. I am so hoping that your readers who have yet to send in a donation will get you to the $10,000 goal by end of year. Enjoy a warm Christmas Day somewhere south of the border.
I got such a kick out of
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Joanna (not verified)I got such a kick out of reading both the numbers-cruching posts and the marvelous stories and photos of the journey through the country that were posted at Nate's site. thanks to them and to you for tempering the campaign hysteria with some grounded analysis!
2008: The Year of the University of Chicago
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Allan BrauerNate Silver: honors Business grad of the U of C
Barack Obama: Senior Lecturer, U of C Law School
Michelle Obama: VP, community affairs, U of C Hospital
Is 2008 the year that the intellectual leadership of the US officially moved from the Ivy League to the "Harvard of the Midwest?" As one who began his undergrad career at the College of the U of C, this has been a proud year for me.
Al, just dropped some money
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Steve Hunt (not verified)Al, just dropped some money into your account. I had promised you this money by the end of last week, but I wasn't doing something correct in the pay pal process. Finally figured out what I was doing wrong on this most appropriate day for 'gifting'.
Whatever your traditions or religion--best wishes to everyone that has supported these cooperative and progressive efforts.
The journalism from this site was integral toward electing more sane and progressive leadership in the US. But this is necessary but not sufficient for the more healthy 'change' that is required for human survival over the long-term.
The alignment of corporate/state power here in the US, and the depoliticized condition of the citizenry, makes it probable that Obama will fall short of what many of us would like. Obama has healthy, democratic inclinations--but we all need to get up and do things differently if we want a more sane and healthy world. There will be appropriate junctures in the future to take Obama to the woodshed. However, this should be engaged without becoming discouraged.
It should be encouraging that the corporate rightwing simply have no viable ideas. They are morally and operationally bankrupt. The US is an organizer's dream at this moment.
The most crucial work in the coming years will entail grass roots mobilization and organization. Surely, efforts by folks like Al will be central toward making progress. Getting up tomarrow and doing things differently, more intelligently, and more artfully--to me, this is the challenge, the 'difference that makes the difference" (Gregory Bateson's definition of 'information').
My political motivation this year
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Lisa in Oregon (not verified)If we will have the wisdom to survive,
to stand like slow growing trees
on a ruined place, renewing, enriching it...
then a long time after we are dead
the lives our lives prepare will live
here, their houses strongly placed
upon the valley sides...
The river will run
clear, as we will never know it...
On the steeps where greed and ignorance cut down
the old forest, an old forest will stand,
its rich leaf-fall drifting on its roots.
The veins of forgotten springs will have opened.
Families will be singing in the fields...
Memory,
native to this valley, will spread over it
like a grove, and memory will grow
into legend, legend into song, song
into sacrament. The abundance of this place,
the songs of its people and its birds,
will be health and wisdom and indwelling
light. This is no paradisal dream.
Its hardship is its reality.
- Wendell Berry
I'm still wondering if the Obama donor model..
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Scott Knox.. is going to work on the state and local levels. Kos certainly was helping whip up support via Red-to-Blue and similar efforts to channel donations to worthy Senate and House candidates, but I'm not totally convinced the 'chicken or the egg' question is answered. Was it the rise of the netroots, or a once-in-a-lifetime candidacy? Even the O-Man couldn't keep up the momentum of his $150 million September.
As for 538, that was Sean Quinn and photographer Brett Marty who covered the developing ground game for the site. And Nate should also get credit for predicting every Senate race - with his prediction of Al Franken having a 52% chance of beating Norm Coleman still to be settled. I think he was able to get concepts like pollster lean, and demographic sample composition far enough into the open that it took away pundits ability to spin results.
A similar development came from snap polling of the debates, you could see the talking heads increasing reluctance to spout their pre-planned talking points knowing that 2 or 3 insta-polls were getting released within a half hour of the event.
We definitely think alike on this point
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Alexa (not verified)“That passage resonated with my long standing policy of never speaking to children, even infants, in "baby talk" [...] I talk to kids of all ages - including my students and protégés - in the same (often gruff and no nonsense, other times irony-and-dark-humor-laden) tones with which I converse with adults.”
Omigod, me too. Same with my parents, BTW. I ran around at age seven telling others to “Please, stop haranguing me!” because that’s what my mother said every time I asked her Why? Why? Why? to edicts I was issued.
Fast-forward to adult life: I was at an outside restaurant on the upper west side in Manhattan (Broadway). The baby in the stroller at the table beside me was between 1-2 years old. The mother wanted to pee. She asked us to watch her baby while she went to bathroom. She felt a need to explain that the kid was “slow” so he wouldn’t present a problem. The mother left. My companion left to get more coffee. I turned to the baby when no one was looking and said, “Listen, you little shit, I know you’re an ex-95-year-old man in the there. You aren’t kidding me. Straighten up and fly right when you get the chance. I know you’re not ‘slow’.”* The baby came to life, his hands and feet clapped the air like a hummingbird, and he cackled and laughed. The mother returned in the middle of this and asked what I said to elicit this response from her beloved child that she thought was a dumb phuck. I winked at the baby and the boy laughed. I said, “Gee, I dont know.”
Children appreciate respect for their personhood. And they know when they’re getting it.
* I swear this is verbatim.
I also just gave
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Kat (not verified)Thanks Al, for being a voice of sanity for me and so many other this year.
538 blog can now be added to lectures on sampling
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Land of Lincoln (not verified)Although retired, I still teach introductory statistics part-time. What fun it will be to discuss the level of accuracy of Nate Silver's analysis vs. the reporting of the "individual big-media sponsored polling companies." Also, U.S. election poll results are frequently cited as examples of certain concepts in statistics texts. After the 2008 election, it's really difficult to justify the continued use of the 1948 Dewey Truman polling example. Most students don't even have land-lines anymore.
In gratitude and celebration
Submitted on December 25th, 2008 by Anne Crumptonjust sent a bit more.
Child is father of the man?
Submitted on December 26th, 2008 by Lucidamente (not verified)Thanks, Al, for your praise of Nate Silver and adulthood. The latter was nicely captured by another wise man, in remarks that nicely complement your own:
"A man's maturity--consists in having found again the seriousness one had as a child, at play."
Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, aphorism 94, trans. Walter Kaufmann
No baby talk
Submitted on December 26th, 2008 by Bill Soo (not verified)I never use "baby talk" either. It just seems demeaning to both the child *and* the adult.
I'm not sure if there is a corelation but both of our children have tested as "gifted". Certainly they appear more mature than other kids their ages (8 and 5).
Also, kids from my extended family (nephews, nieces etc.) plus my kids friends seem drawn to me. I think kids do appreciate when they are *heard* and *respected*.
Today is Boxer day ...
Submitted on December 26th, 2008 by Anne Crumptonif we can, lets serve up a bit for the yeomen and trusted servants of authentic journalism - serving us all and keeping us sane in an insane world.
Amen
Submitted on December 26th, 2008 by Rachel (not verified)My goal as a mother and as a journalist is to address people with the respect and assumption of intellectual curiosity that I want to be accorded. Seems to be working so far - this afternoon, my 3 1/2 year old daughter wants me to take her on an anthropological dig to find fossils -she wants to find bones that are "really, really old. Maybe even 20 years old, Mummy!!!" Egad.
And reading fivethirtyeight.com made me wish I'd gone past intro statistics at BU... With all love to my alma mater, the College of Communication syllabus allows far to many future writers/analysts/communicators to get away with slipping out of classes like mathematics, philosophy, history. As I go further on into this gig, the more I realize that teaching the mechanics of journalism should be left to a real newsroom, and that the classroom should be about instilling the analytical basis to frame the writing.
Beyond small donors: Bypassing the media
Submitted on December 26th, 2008 by Benjamin MelançonGetting lots of people to give small amounts of money which is mostly given to media corporations in large chunks is not a viable long-term strategy. We need small media, we need control of our own communication channels. The state and local campaigns, which may have a harder time generating the interest and excitement to fuel a small-donor campaign than national office, may be in a better position to use volunteer time, money, work and barainpower to bypass the media gatekeepers that distort our political conversations.. and get paid back with money to run campaign ads.
My dad frowned on baby talk.
Submitted on December 27th, 2008 by Amie HowellNo one was allowed talk "baby" around me or my bro. (My dad won't even talk like that to animals). When my bro was 1 and a half, if you asked him "How old are you?", he wouldn't say "I'm this many". His answer was "I'm approximately two". Honest to God.
Anyhoo, another awesome post, Al. I planned to donate before Xmas, but my comp has a virus and is being fussy. So I donated just now. Only $10, but for me that is a lot. I encourage all to donate to support Authentic Journalism & The Field, even if you can only afford $5 or $10 like me. If small donations are good enough for Obama...well, u know. :-)
Hope u had a really good Navidad, Al, with lots of food, fun & good company!
Si somos americanos, seremos buenos vecinos;
compartiremos el trigo,seremos buenos hermanos -- canción de Rolando Alarcón
Todos somos americanos.-- Barack Obama
great post, Al
Submitted on December 27th, 2008 by Klaus (not verified)I've also made a point of talking to all people the same way, regardless of age. Some kids (generally pampered ones), of course, hate it, but I've found most kids appreciate it and will generally behaved better if they feel respected as a fully cognizant human being.
As for 538, it wasn't just recognition of poor interpretations that made people more skeptical, it was the realization of blatant doctoring. For example, the CBS poll which drastically changed its sample demographics week-to-week to make sure their polls matched the CW (i.e., if Obama was hit by a fabricated "scandal," you could rely on their pollster to ratchet up the number of Republicans in the sample). Also, we can't forget the much-hyped Bradley Effect, spoken of with such confidence by Chicken Littles and desperately flogged by the media.
Totally OT:
Submitted on December 27th, 2008 by Tien Le (not verified)I know there is no faith in the change.gov issues process, but I'd still like to promote one: http://www.change.org/ideas/view/permit_the_sale_of_raw_organic_almonds
Seriously, the law forcing almonds to be pasteurized is beyond folly. It removes all the flavor and a good bit of the nutrition from this priceless food.
Thanks, Al
Submitted on December 27th, 2008 by rikyrah (not verified)Between you and 538, it kept me on an even keel. I absolutely became a 'Poblano' fan during the Obama sweep of the mid-Atlantic.
And, the 'On the Road' series was one of the best -PERIOD - of this election season. No journalistic outfit was as thorough, or gave us a better look and feel of this country than that series.
Obama's small donror myth
Submitted on December 28th, 2008 by Companero (not verified)Love Narconews.
Was startled by this: "All future candidates for any office should have to answer this question first: Can you, like Obama, fund your campaign mainly with small donors?"
The kids gloves on Obama has been tolerable for sometime, but now let's get to it, and with reality on our side. There are lots of arguments about the study done (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/11/obama-money.html), mostly about the category of what "small donor" is. The point is he got lots and lot and lots of corporate $. And we will need to push him and the gang surrounding him big time to stop the killings in central and south america funded by good ole us of a. Being from Chicago, folks ought to be more savvy. Palante!
I find it interesting
Submitted on December 29th, 2008 by Klaus (not verified)how both the right and far left are now clinging to the same dubious articles to attack Obama. By the definition of that LA Times article, little ole' me (with my series of $50 donations) is a big mean corporate super-millionaire donor.
So Companero, seeing as how I'm a big money donor, I'll see what I can do for you about amending drug policy.
@ Klaus
Submitted on December 29th, 2008 by Laura M. PoyneerI maxed out to Obama with a series of donations over 10 months so I must really be a fat cat! It is a new experience to have people bemoaning my influence in politics :\